Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indianapolis Star lays off 62 in cost-saving purge
IBJ.com ^ | June 21, 2011 | CorySchouten

Posted on 06/21/2011 6:54:29 PM PDT by digger48

The Indianapolis Star on Tuesday laid off 62 employees including more than 15 percent of its newsroom staff in the latest round of cost-cutting by Gannett Co. Inc., the newspaper's parent company.

Among those laid off in Indianapolis were 26 newsroom employees including 12 copy editors and eight reporters, mostly those covering suburban news. The Star also eliminated 19 open positions, said Robert King, the newspaper's religion and philanthropy reporter and president of the Indianapolis Newspaper Guild.

"The Indianapolis Star, I’ve been told repeatedly, continues to make money," King wrote in an e-mail. "Yet Gannett, and its corporate bosses in Virginia, seem to view workers not as assets but as liabilities on a balance sheet."

McLean, Va.-based Gannett, which owns 82 newspapers as well as TV stations, earned $90 million on revenue of $1.25 billion in the first quarter. That compared with a profit of $117 million on $1.3 billion in revenue in the same period a year earlier.

The local layoffs were part of a nationwide purge of about 700 employees in the newspaper chain's U.S. Community Publishing division, a move the company blamed on a sluggish economic recovery. The job cuts amount to 2 percent of Gannett's total work force, according to an internal memo from Bob Dickey, the chain's head of community newspapers.

"National advertising remains soft and with many of our local advertisers reducing their overall budgets, we need to take further steps to align our costs with the current revenue trends," Dickey wrote in the memo. "Each of our local media organizations faces its own market conditions, challenges and opportunities. Therefore, it has been up to each local publisher to determine his or her unique course of action."

Indianapolis Star Publisher Karen Crotchfelt, who took the helm in December, did not return a phone message from IBJ.

The Dickey memo said Gannett would institute furloughs for executives in its community publishing business who earn above an unspecified salary "in an effort to reduce the number of people being let go."

For Gannett, it is the fourth large round of layoffs in three years. In 2009, the company cut 1,400 jobs in its community publishing division.

King, the local guild president, said those let go were "hard-working folks who care about the communities they served."

The Star's newsroom has 136 employees after the latest round of layoffs, down from 230 in 2007.

"Going forward, we have good people here who will do as they have always done—work harder under more difficult circumstances," King wrote. "But it's hard to imagine how the quality of The Indianapolis Star and indystar.com will remain the same, and how readers will be served by this."

Gannett earned $541 million on $5.4 billion in revenue last year, and CEO Craig Dubow took home salary and benefits worth $9.4 million, double his take in 2009.

Part of Dubow's compensation was a $1.75 million bonus partly tied to achievements in "restructuring costs and creating efficiencies."

Gannett shares rose almost 3 percent today, to $14.15.


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bigmedia; corporatemedia; enemedia; gannett

1 posted on 06/21/2011 6:54:30 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: digger48

As a local, I can say the only useful part of the Star is Gary Varvel’s editorial cartoons.


2 posted on 06/21/2011 6:59:34 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Among those laid off in Indianapolis were 26 newsroom employees including 12 copy editors and eight reporters, mostly those covering suburban news

Since a reader can get national and world news just about anywhere 24/7 these days, the suburban and local news should be the core of the newspaper in 2011. Too bad these pompous asses don't get that. Lots of local and community papers doing fine under the radar of the bloated "nationals."

3 posted on 06/21/2011 7:06:42 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I quit that rag years ago. I always take time to explain why when they call to remind me my subscription has expired (I cancelled atleast 8 years ago,) and always ask that they pass the info on to their superiors.


4 posted on 06/21/2011 7:08:00 PM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Yep, gotta love Gary’s work.

On another note: I sure hope Karen’s maiden name isn’t Crotchfelt. I can’t imagine a girl going through school with that moniker.


5 posted on 06/21/2011 7:08:54 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: digger48

If and when technology puts information where it is comfortable to read on the can, the dinosaur media is done.

For the moment, no alternatives are, let us say, satisfying...


6 posted on 06/21/2011 7:11:20 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Nobody reads the Star anymore. Ryerson is a self-important pustule of left-wing bloviation. His reporterette wife is a piece of work as well.


7 posted on 06/21/2011 7:11:52 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

I’ve lived in several places in the US. The Star is a decent paper. I have to say it is rather level in bias (until you get to the opinion section). Problem is, many if not most of the articles are syndicated, AP or independents. I was surprised they had that many in the news room.


8 posted on 06/21/2011 7:12:36 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Before Gannett bought the Indy Star, it was a pretty good paper and some East Coast libs made disparging remarks about it being too conservative and also being owned by Dan Quayle’s family. If I remember right I was still living in Indy when they got bought out and started to make a leftward turn like pro-homosexual commentary.


9 posted on 06/21/2011 7:17:21 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

I stopped that fishwrap back in the early 90’s.


10 posted on 06/21/2011 7:32:26 PM PDT by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
bingo... local papers need to print LOCAL NEWS!!!
11 posted on 06/21/2011 7:40:41 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48
<sarc>They should be expanding their business, not contracting. Obviously these greedy bastards are just laying off workers to maximize their profits. Obamao should raise their taxes to get a piece of the new windfall profits they'll be getting from this move, which is not making his administration look good.</sarc>
12 posted on 06/21/2011 7:43:40 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCH
Source: Indianapolis Star HUNTINGTON, Ind. -- The family of former Vice President Dan Quayle has sold its newspaper holdings to Paxton Media Group, ending more than 70 years of ownership of the northeastern Indiana daily. /snip/ The late James C. Quayle, father of Dan Quayle, purchased The Herald-Press in 1964. It had been part of Indianapolis-based Central Newspapers, owned by James Quayle's father-in-law, Eugene C. Pulliam, for 34 years. Dan Quayle, who was vice president from 1989-93 under George H.W. Bush, once worked at the newspaper. He and his wife, Marilyn, once operated their Quayle & Quayle law office from the second floor of the newspaper building. The couple now lives in Arizona.

Good for them.

13 posted on 06/21/2011 8:01:58 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: digger48

I only hope those laid-off voted for nobama. To them...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


14 posted on 06/21/2011 8:04:30 PM PDT by hal ogen ( of Rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

To their credit, the Indianapolis Star did not endorse Obama for President in 2008.


15 posted on 06/21/2011 8:28:14 PM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Indianapolis Star Publisher Karen Crotchfelt,

Is this a joke name like Biggeth Dicketh or Naughtius Maximus?

16 posted on 06/21/2011 9:35:46 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
She's not guilty, either!


17 posted on 06/21/2011 9:39:05 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
"Is this a joke name like Biggeth Dicketh or Naughtius Maximus?"

Not to quibble with you, but it's "Biggus" - "Biggus Dickus"... and his wife "Incontinentia Buttocks." They're very popular in D.C. right now.

18 posted on 06/21/2011 9:49:56 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson