Posted on 04/29/2011 11:41:05 AM PDT by West Texas Chuck
Um hmmm, I was expecting that. So now we have a fourth BC. It just gets stranger and stranger. Maybe I need to add the current one to my collection.
Re #12
I am looking at an original photocopy of a 1952 New York City birth certificate, and another from Alabama in 1941. Neither have footprints. I think the footprints were mostly on hospital birth certificates.
What did you enter for your "race" on the 2010 Census? I wrote in "American", as did many other Freepers if they are to be believed. So how is that any different?
The problem Obama and the Hawaiian officials have, is their history of being unscrupulous and stonewalling with misinformation and attacks on the public seeking answers, for almost three years, adds to the suspicion of the digital image they have now finally offered.
My biggest bone of contention right now is that I want the document put on display.
I don't trust a digital copy from these people.
Are you saying that there are no white people in Africa?
And can you show me the result from the 2010 Census Bureau that gives the percentage of “Americans” living in America?
Can’t verify, don’t have Illustrator. File sizes look the same. Displays the same seemingly odd behavior in Paint. If you click on it in Adobe and copy to Paint you still get the “whiteout” effect so there is still some layering or something going on. I’m no expert in this arena.
Nothing but deflection. How about answering the question?
The first link in your post is the Denninger video, which is what turned me around on this issue and made me a sceptic. That guy Denninger sure sounds like he knows what he is talking about and from what I understand of the technology, I think he is 100% right on.
The second link I hadn’t seen before but is pretty good info, thanx DL.
Obviously, you are not happy about that.
Put some ice on it.
In your dreams!
Grow up.
Also....Why post an obvious forgery of a COLB when this “official” birth certificate existed( supposedly not a forgery, this time). The two contain the same information, so why post a fake COLB in the first place and a supposedly real one now?
It simply does not make sense. Given that he as already posted a forgery 2 years ago, why should we believe that this one ( with essentially the same information) is real this time?
And....Why let a man go to prison, and ruin Major Cook’s career, over something so innocuous ( if is isn’t a fake)? The judge said it would be an embarrassment. So?....Where’s the embarrassment?
The NHS and CDC, NCHS, and other Fed agencies have standards that were in effect in 1961 and they still are. SAD may have stated African as baby daddy;s race, but UKLLEE or whoever the registrar was, would have had to correct that. There were coded races, African was not an acceptable race, not then , not now, not ever. I have been trying to find the rules and the categories that were accepted and which are now, can’t find it, but I have read it and I guarentee you that African would not have passed the registrars desk, if it had it would have been rejected and returned. It is Called Natility I believe.
Maybe this will help answer a few questions already sorted out before new threads are started, at least until it turns into another hair-pulling, face scratching, dress tearing free-for-all like some threads around here have.Hair-pulling, face scratching, dress tearing -- hmm, that doesn't sound that bad.
When looked at that way, the way it really is, the term "birther" is a reflection of leftist irrationality and has nothing whatsoever to do with the people it's aimed at.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.