David Evans, Carbon Accounting Modeler, Says It’s a Scam

JoNova ^ | March 26th, 2011 | Joanne

[FlingWingFlyer]

I’m always skeptical when someone says, you can keep doing what you’re doing, I just want you to pay me to do it. That’s what is going on with the commie Cap and Tax scheme.

[labette]

".. making fools and liars out of our politicians."

The three words aren't synonymous ?

[True Republican Patriot]

AMEN!! Fantastic Article by an Expert and a Fantastic Post!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Trying out a new ....to me....Linux operating system to help with my vision problems (Vinux) ....hope this looks OK.

[fred2008]

Thanks for the find!

[steelyourfaith]

"Join the Competitive Enterprise for Human Achievement Hour, an annual celebration of individual freedom and appreciation of the achievements and innovations that people have used to improve their lives throughout history, this Saturday March 26th 2011, 8:00 PM. Click here to learn more. Human Achievement Hour is the pro-human, pro-energy alternative to Earth Hour, the Green’s celebration of a darker world, also scheduled from 8-9 PM on March 26th. Co-sponsored by The Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights."

Thanx for the ping Ernest_at_the_Beach !

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[rlmorel]

Excellent. Ping for later...

[Wuli]

ping

[Senator_Blutarski]

Bump for later

[The_Media_never_lie]

If I had only had the wisdom to short carbon futures when this debacle was unfolding, I could have made lots of money! Such a silly scam!!!

[SuziQ]

AGW Hoax ping!

[TigersEye]

Let’s be perfectly clear. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and other things being equal, the more carbon dioxide in the air, the warmer the planet. Every bit of carbon dioxide that we emit warms the planet. But the issue is not whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much.

I'm glad this guy is coming around but he's still willfully ignoring some basic tenets of science. If the theory proves itself to not be the operative factor the question of whether the theory is valid or not becomes irrelevant.

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.

------------------------------------------------------------

The absence of a 'hotspot' means that we can assume, for sake of argument, that Greenhouse Theory is correct and conclude that both man and nature put together are not increasing greenhouse gasses enough to cause any warming that may be happening. A theory cannot simultaneously prove itself right and wrong.

[Marine_Uncle]

Another good summary of what the deal really is. Hope your new system works out well. One of these days I have to get my glasses changed. I’m long over due.

[Northern Yankee]

Outstaning article.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Looking thru the comments now...see this one:

****************************EXCERPT**************************

4

Eddy Aruda:
March 26th, 2011 at 3:23 am

There has never been even one shred of empirical evidence to support the CAGW scam. The closest they ever got was the now thoroughly debunked and discredited hokey schtick (MBH98) and Briffa et. al. temperature reconstructions which suffered the same fate as Mann’s ginormous fraud. A small cabal of rent seeking scientists at the CRU in conjunction with their gravy train riding counterparts in the U.S. (Hansen and company) engineered this scam. They did it for the most ancient of motives: avarice and pride. They peer reviewed each others papers and censored other who disagreed. They conspired to obstructed justice and sold their souls in the process. They were responsible for the one chapter of the IPCC report that blames humans for CAGW. No contributor to the IPCC report was asked to sign a document agreeing with the conclusions of the assessment reports. Because their interest aligned with socialist politicians they had significant influence on who got published as well as funded. And in the real world it is indeed all about the money. You either go along to get along or become ostracized and unemployed.

Not one of the climate scientists’ model forecasts has come true. The liberal media has not only acquiesced in this fraud but they are an accessory to it. After all, if it bleeds it leads and the end of the world catastrophic warming hype sold a lot of papers and attracted a lot of advertising dollars.

Meanwhile, we rape the third world of their vital and precious resources and tell them to essentially live in the stone age. The average life span of someone living in Sub Saharan Africa is 45! Their lives are short and brutish. And this to please the neo-malthusians?! So much for the liberals clamor for social justice!

The useful idiots who bend to the will of their green masters have gotten away with this pogrom until now because it didn’t effect the first world’s standard of living. Societal change is normally born of economic necessity. A revolution is unlikely to occur when all is relatively well. As people realize that the greens real intent is to control the very breath they exhale they are starting to react. I believe we are at the very beginning of this reaction and that this groundswell will continue to grow until this scam is swept away! I pray that I live long enough to see it so a bounty on the climate criminals heads, dead or alive!

[Windflier]

Great article, Ernest. Thanks for posting it. I may just pass it along to my email list.

The article brings up a pet peeve of mine, which is, that the so-called science channels and programs on cable (and PBS) continue to sing the ‘Climate Change’ mantra, even when the whole subject has been proven to be rife with fraud and untruths.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

More:

*********************EXCERPT**************************

Rereke Whakaaro:
March 26th, 2011 at 7:57 am

Eddy Aruda: #4

Another of your temperate summaries, I see

But I absolutely agree with you.

One thing that strikes me is that this is predominantly a US and European phenomena, with Australia and New Zealand jumping up and down on the sidelines saying, me too, me too. (I have said as much before).

But nobody is really talking about China. I spend a lot of time watching China, and other parts of Asia, and they are very positive about AGW, and the steps that the West are taking to address the issue.

But have you noticed that the non-western countries are in no great hurry to follow? Have you noticed that, for some reason, they are not expected to follow?

The UN is primarily based in New York and Geneva. The EU is based in Brussels and Strasbourg. So both organisations work within a societal framework that still has a predominantly catholic philosophy that man (meaning humankind) is irredeemably sinful. The British in particular, are always apologising to each other for something, whether real or imagined.

The west actually feels guilty about its industrial and financial success, and in true catholic style is using AGW as a form of self-flagellation. And the non-western countries, in their condemnation that “the west” is destroying the planet, are actually reinforcing those feelings of guilt.

We either need to wake up to that fact, or start learning Mandarin.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Right....see #18 from the comments to the article.

[Carry_Okie]

Good piece, but still missing both solar forcing and the resulting amount of CO2 released from the ocean due to the change in solubility in sea water, both of which are major factors in what we see.