[mnehring]

In the photography world, implied nudity is not the same as nudity. No actual naughty bits are shown. And no, you weren't right, that is no indication she is a porn star, skank like you called her. That type of photograph could be seen in a Victoria's Secret catalog or heck, a shampoo commercial.

[GeronL]

I don’t care about “naughty bits” any one who takes it off for the world to see is a skank in my definition