[GreenAccord]

Can anything be gleaned (regarding biad) by the author's mis-use of the product's actual name: "iPad" by referring to this as an "Ipad"? I mean, if you're going to write a tech article, and want to be taken seriously, shouldn't you call the product by its actual name?

[GreenAccord]

you know, my Firefox was underlining “biad” and I chose to ignore it. Sheese... “bias” Apologies.

[Swordmaker]

Can anything be gleaned (regarding biad) by the author's mis-use of the product's actual name: "iPad" by referring to this as an "Ipad"? I mean, if you're going to write a tech article, and want to be taken seriously, shouldn't you call the product by its actual name?

Yes, you can glean that this writer is an idiot who prefers to denigrate and misrepresent Apple, its Financial reports, its products, users, and everything about the company and this is just the latest in a long line of such FUD articles in the Inquirer where he has repeatedly done the same thing. ;^)>