Officer won't sign order for troop indoctrination

WND ^ | December 24, 2010 | Brian Fitzpatrick

[Michael Barnes]

An Army lieutenant colonel has asked to be relieved of command rather than order his troops to go through pro-homosexual indoctrination following the repeal of the policy, which required homosexuals to keep silent about their sexual preference. Currently the commander of a battalion-sized unit in the Army National Guard, the officer also has threatened to resign his commission rather than undergo "behavior modification" training intended to counter his religious convictions about homosexuality.

[Michael Barnes]

uh-oh...Could get interesting in the ranks as well..

[Uncle Miltie]

Your First Amendment Rights stop at the Recruiting Station?

[mtg]

Good for him!

[OldMissileer]

This was posted a few days ago but... those who object will just be replaced by a bunch of fags who will bully the hetero’s and promote the homo's.

They will turn our military into the armed thug contingent that Obama talked about during his campaign. He will not need to build a whole new organization and there will be nobody to stop him from the final destruction of our Country.

[stylin19a]

the RATS had this "indoctrination" policy already written and waiting.
I wonder what it cost the crap REPUBS to put in the fix to pass this crap samwhich ?

[anniegetyourgun]

All part of the plan - largely intended to harm Christians.

[massgopguy]

The first question a Recruiter will now ask is “are you a Christian?” Think Jay Robinson as Caligula.

[dangerdoc]

“Your First Amendment Rights stop at the Recruiting Station?”

They always have, but I fully support him and he approaching the situation in the correct professional way.

[freeangel]

God bless him!

[Godwin1]

If large numbers of officers and senior NCOs follow the colonel's lead, this could be a significant problem for Zero and the despicable members of Congress who deliberately damaged the military in exchange for approving pats on the head from the NYTIMES, Washington Post, the TV networks and other advocates of perversion and degeneracy. I'm hoping, but not holding my breath

[Redleg Duke]

Yes they do, but you have a responsibility to your conscience.

[MeganC]

“Your First Amendment Rights stop at the Recruiting Station?”

Yes, they do and that’s nothing new.

What remains to be seen is if the officers who resign over this will have their resignations refused so the Obamanations can prosecute them for their beliefs.

It’s like the old saying about gays in the military and now it’s coming true:

*What was once prohibited becomes optional just before it becomes mandatory.*

It won’t be too long before saying you’re a Christian will get you bounced from the military.

[Boonie]

I’m not too sure how well a bunch of armed fags would stand up against a bunch of good ole boys raised with rifles and shotguns in the south, mideast, southwest, and high west...

[napscoordinator]

The 0-5’s are the only ones with guts in the military it seems. The dude that refused to go to Afghanistan because of Obama was crazy but gutsy. And now this guy who is resigning instead of getting any indoctrination to his troops. I think this is a bit premature though as nothing as been directed by Washington yet.

[Michael Barnes]

You're right it was. Looks like that thread has 145 posts. Mod, can you lock this thread please??

[BenLurkin]

"My personal religious beliefs and moral convictions do not permit me to treat homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle, compatible with military service, any more than adultery, illicit drug use, or criminal activity."

[Alberta's Child]

The biggest problem the Obama administration faces on this matter is not the "regular" officers like this guy . . . it's the chaplain corps in all four branches.

Obama may very well be remembered as the jack@ss who ended up putting devout Christians, radical Muslims and Orthodox Jews on the same side -- squarely against him.

[longtermmemmory]

Chaplains are optional.

This is like that closet female admiral they put in charge. The question is whether the pentagon can hold off for two years.

[pnh102]

Is it “legal” for this officer to be asked to be relieved of command in such a situation?

[LouAvul]

The pro-faggot mentality in govt will just weed out the patriots and decent folk until the military is commanded by perverts. We’re in for a rough ride.