Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Joe Sestak overtakes Pat Toomey (We've Taken This Race For Granted)
The Morning Call ^ | October 19, 2010 | Colby Itkowitz

Posted on 10/20/2010 2:13:06 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA

Democrat Sestak now leads Republican Toomey 44 percent to 41 percent with 15 percent undecided, a Morning Call/Muhlenberg College Tracker poll shows.

(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: pa; sestak; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
We need to start supporting Toomey hard in this race. We took it for granted a solid Conservative would breeze through in a blue state. Especially PA. If this is true, Toomey lost 9 points in less than a month and there have not been any gaffs on his part.
1 posted on 10/20/2010 2:13:12 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

College polls make for good threads but not good polls


2 posted on 10/20/2010 2:14:23 PM PDT by italianquaker ( teabag the vote!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Maybe this list on Sestak might be helpful..

http://www.nachumlist.com/sestak.htm


3 posted on 10/20/2010 2:15:39 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
Look for junk polls from here out. Read earlier that this ones internals distort the balance between Dem, Pubbie and Indies.
4 posted on 10/20/2010 2:16:19 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

15% undecided is a large amount? Looks like they might have been for Toomey but now decided to be undecided now, blah blah blah....


5 posted on 10/20/2010 2:16:37 PM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

This poll and the PPP are both bogus. Don’t lose heart.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/20/2nd-poll-shows-toomey-falling-behind-sestak-in-pa/


6 posted on 10/20/2010 2:16:51 PM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

These folks are usually in the ball park. I dismissed the PPP poll yesterday, but two in a row showing significant loss makes me nervous.

http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/


7 posted on 10/20/2010 2:17:23 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA ("Forces of Evil" member in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Don’t you believe it. Yeah, by all means keep Sandy Berger favorite Sestak out of the Senate, but this poll is probably inaccurate.


8 posted on 10/20/2010 2:17:37 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Class warfare is Obama's thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

The poll is crap. A minuscule sample size. Wait for the next Rasmussen.


9 posted on 10/20/2010 2:17:41 PM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
The beauty of the Internet is that, now, we can debunk garbage polls in a matter of minutes. This poll was cooked by Democrats who are trying to generate some momentum on the D side. Don't worry but keep working like your freedom depends on defeating Democrats. It, in fact, does.
10 posted on 10/20/2010 2:19:54 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

hope I am right and you are wrong but PA is always a tease


11 posted on 10/20/2010 2:20:48 PM PDT by italianquaker ( teabag the vote!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

It’s not true. Look at who took the poll. Do you see them polling a lot? Do you see their polls quoted as accurate?

The press is happy to grab anything that point to what they want and wave it around.

Even if the methodology is solid, there is still generally a 1 in 20 chance that a poll like this will just give wrong data (the second part of the “margin of error). A poll in that case is an “outlier”, as it lies outside of the area of confidence.

Show me a Gallup, Rassmussen or Mason-Dixon poll showing Sestak ahead and I would get concerned.


12 posted on 10/20/2010 2:21:09 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
This might be my fault. I sent him ten bucks to to help defeat Spectre.
13 posted on 10/20/2010 2:21:34 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I do not believe it and neither should you.

LLS


14 posted on 10/20/2010 2:22:07 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
College polls make for good threads but not good polls

Lemee see, Lefty Poly-Sci professor says, "Let's put on a poll!", and the eager young faces say, "Yes, let's!", and so you have a poll. Then the professor says, "You know who has to win?", and the students say, "Yes!". And the professor, calls the nerd of the class, a kid who know's numbers. His name is, Idoo Skew. The professor says, "You know what you need to do, Mr. Skew? "Yes professor, as my name says, `I Do Skew` ", and those internals will look nothing like they really are, but they will give you the desired result. The professor says, "That's great, but don't be so honest."
15 posted on 10/20/2010 2:22:08 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

I’m not surprised that Sestak is polling well on a public college campus. When your only poll showing you ahead was performed by fuzzy thinking profs at the local college, you know things are really going well.


16 posted on 10/20/2010 2:23:20 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Poll, schmoll. The real poll is November 2nd. These bogus polls are just for the sake of deflating the Tea Party movement. Keep the faith! Keep pushing! Don’t let ‘em get to you!


17 posted on 10/20/2010 2:23:37 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Morning Call/Muhlenberg College

Ten to one they polled their Political "Science" Department.

18 posted on 10/20/2010 2:24:38 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Who the heck are Morning Call/Muhlenberg College?
Never heard of these suckers.
Last genuine poll had Toomey comfortably ahead..and that was just 6 days ago.

"Election 2010: Pennsylvania Senate
Pennsylvania Senate: Toomey (R) Grows Lead Over Sestak (D)
"
Thursday, October 14, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThisRepublican Pat Toomey now holds a 10-point lead over Democratic Congressman Joe Sestak, the widest gap between the candidates since early April in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate race.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Pennsylvania shows Toomey earning 49% of the vote, while Sestak picks up 39% support. Two percent (2%) prefer some other candidate, but a sizable 10% remain undecided less than three weeks before Election Day. "
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/2010_senate_election/election_2010_pennsylvania_senate

Election 2010: Pennsylvania Senate
Pat Toomey (R) 49%
Joe Sestak (D) 39%
Some Other Candidate 2%
Not sure 10%

19 posted on 10/20/2010 2:25:09 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Did they change their formula/ratio like the PPP did?

The PP went from a 46d/44r to 48d, 41r and tried to highlight the “jump” for Sestak


20 posted on 10/20/2010 2:25:15 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson