Posted on 08/06/2010 6:20:29 AM PDT by Mr. K
This story was originally about how people at the pentagon were banned from going to the wikileaks site
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Who 'forced' them and how?
Wouldn't they need to see it to investigate what is on there?
I am as paranoid as anyone here, but perhaps it contained a factual error. They said they “were forced,” not that “fill in the blank” forced them. Perhaps they will explain later.
Does anyone still have any doubts that The Constitution is null and void, or that der Fuhrer 0bama is a dictator?
The story is still there, just under a different title.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/6/pentagon-bars-staff-from-visiting-wikileaks-site/
(Aug 6 vs Aug 5 date in URL).
shadow government is in control
This is the story you were looking for
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/6/pentagon-bars-staff-from-visiting-wikileaks-site/
That story has been removed from the site
Every so often we are forced to remove stories from our site. Were sorry but you just happened to request one of them.
Take a look at some of the other content on our site by going to our home page.
Move along, move along.
Thank you!!!
If it is criminal to download a protected movie or other illegal content from the web then the conclusion should be drawn that it is ALSO criminal to download the wikileaks content no matter if you claim to live in a journalist’s ivory tower.
Espionage and treason are crimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.