Posted on 08/05/2010 7:54:43 AM PDT by Sopater
Most people have heard of the "Got Milk?" and milk mustache advertising campaigns that are designed to promote the sale and consumption of milk and milk products in the United States. The advertising and promotion of dairy products is overseen by the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board (National Dairy Board - NDB), an organization that is a part of the Agricultural Marketing Services (AMS); AMS is a division of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and administers programs that help market U.S. agricultural products.
According to AMS's website, "The Dairy Production Stabilization Act of 1983" (Dairy Act) authorized a national producer program for dairy product promotion, research and nutrition education to increase human consumption of milk and dairy products and reduce milk surpluses" [1]. The Dairy Research and Promotion Program (DRPP) is funded by a 15-cents per hundredweight charge "on all milk produced in the contiguous 48 states and marketed commercially by dairy farmers." Failure to pay the assessment can result in fines of up to $1,000 per violation under the Dairy Act.
The money the DRPP has spent on advertising has gone toward promoting the consumption of pasteurized milk. The next time the NDB promotes the consumption of raw milk will be the first. If the NDB has ever undertaken any research projects on raw milk for human consumption, the research has not been made public.
| So a department that discourages the consumption of raw milk is trying to extract money from those it would put out of business. |
It is therefore surprising that the NDB is now trying to collect the 15-cents assessment from farmers selling retail raw milk. In the past year or so, the NDB has tried to collect from Grade A dairies that also have a license to sell retail raw milk, from at least one non-Grade A dairy that only has a license to sell retail raw milk, and even from one unlicensed dairy that was operating a herdshare program. The NDB is categorizing those selling raw milk for human consumption as 'producer handlers' who market milk from their own dairy herd, and is informing them that they "must report and remit to NDB this assessment on that portion of their production that they marketed as milk or dairy products."
A search of the USDA's website indicates that not only does the department fail to show any support for raw milk, but it discourages consumers from drinking raw milk! Typifying USDA's position on raw milk is a January 12, 2005 press release from the department announcing the publication of "Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005" [2]. In the release, USDA recommends that in order to avoid microbial foodborne illness, consumers should "avoid raw (unpasteurized) milk or any products made from unpasteurized milk..."
In addition, a number of press releases announcing the recall of food products contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes can be found on USDA's website. Listeria monocytogenes is a bacteria responsible for a number of cases of foodborne illness due to listeriosis each year. It is found frequently in deli meats. However, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), there has not been a case of listeriosis in the U.S. caused by the consumption of raw milk going back to at least 1972 and possibly never [3]. Nonetheless, any USDA press release on the recall of food products contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes is accompanied by a warning that those at risk for listeriosis should not consume raw milk.
So a department discouraging the consumption of raw milk is trying to extract money from those it would put out of business. In the words of one producer pressured by NDB to pay the assessment, "It's like requiring a black person to make a donation to the Ku Klux Klan."
Raw milk produced for pasteurization and raw milk produced for human consumption are two different products. NDB is only promoting pasteurized milk; they should not be trying to collect money from those producing raw milk for retail sale
Raw whole milk is the best milk I’ve ever tasted. I’ve read that fat-free and low-fat milk has powdered milk added to it to make it more pleasing to the eye. It’s not on the label because it is an industry standard. Does anybody know if this is true? I can’t find anything to back the claim, but we’ve switched to whole milk anyway. I just think it’s better for us. Our bodies actually need some sat fat.
“... we’ve switched to whole milk anyway. I just think it’s better for us. Our bodies actually need some sat fat.”
The only fat you get is from milk? What are you a rabbit?
I’ve never heard of the American diet lacking in fat intake
I made no claims that the only fat I get is from milk. How silly of you to make that assumption.
Do you have a ping list for Raw Milk? If so, please add me. I’ve never had any. A farm woman who brought a milking cow to the county fair told me it’s illegal in Virginia even to give it away, let alone sell it. A cheesemaker I saw at the Charlottesville farmer’s market was giving the cheese away, with a sign saying that since he couldn’t sell it, he’d rather give it away than throw out the milk he makes it from. Apparently turning it into cheese makes the giving legal.
Nice!
She said “bones” :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.