Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy SEAL Jim O’Neill - Lt. Col. Lakin, and Commander Fitz
canadafreepress ^ | 4/21/2010 | Jim O'Neill

Posted on 04/21/2010 8:42:24 PM PDT by rxsid

"Lt. Col. Lakin, and Commander Fitz

“Let’s pretend for a moment that we’re not all being treated like mentally challenged six-year-olds, and that it’s out on the table that the current POTUS has been blatantly hiding his past from the American electorate. Let’s also pretend that neither the media, nor our judicial system, find it laughably funny when “we the people” insist on knowing the REAL history of the person running America’s economy, military, and domestic/foreign policies.

“Let’s pretend as well, that America is still a republic, ruled by law as filtered through the U.S. Constitution.

“If we pretend all those things, then it makes perfect sense to question Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS, and expect our concerns to be treated as legitimate, vitally important issues.

“Unfortunately, in all too many cases, our legal system has been so twisted and perverted over the years, it no longer represents a republic ruled by law, and “we the people” are being treated like dim-witted, unruly six-year-olds, and mocked and ridiculed by the media, pundits, the judicial system, and politicians.”"

Continued:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22276

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fitzpatrick; lakin; naturalborncitizen; nbc; obama
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

Factcheck.org goes on to say this about Obama Sr., Jr. and the British Nationality Act of 1948:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

 

Even the modern day State Department rules discusses the problems associated with dual citizenship:

7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality:

(e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.

...

the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that dual nationality is a "status long recognized in the law" and that "a person may have and exercise rights of nationality in two countries and be subject to the responsibilities of both." See Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86563.pdf

So, back to the question: "HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?"
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born), a fact backed up by Factcheck.org. Assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth.
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!

Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro * NOT Obama / Soetoro
* This assumes HI birth.

http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com

Furthermore:  Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].) This notification would then have automatically generated the newspaper announcements. (This was the practice of the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin at the time).

Bottom line: Even IF (big IF) he was born in HI, he inherited his father's foreign citizenship as well, making him a US citizen by US law and the subject of the crown of her majesty the Queen of England by inheritance and England's law. He could not be considered a Natural Born Citizen as known by and as intended by the framers.

1 posted on 04/21/2010 8:42:24 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rxsid

insist on knowing the REAL history of the person running America’s economy, military, and domestic/foreign policies...

...INTO THE GROUND. There, fixed that one.


2 posted on 04/21/2010 8:47:19 PM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

3 posted on 04/21/2010 8:52:02 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

It is going to take more and more military and the states asking for the BC to stop this coup.


4 posted on 04/21/2010 8:54:45 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain & Graham = La Raza's favorite Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

They must get away from the BC......even with a BC he is not a NBC! NBC must be clarified if not we will be destroyed from within! Think 20 yrs. from now, can a child born to illegals, who are aligned with La Raza become President because they were born here even though their parents have no allegiance to this country? What about Pakistan? Saudi Arabia? There was a reason NBC was written, the founders did not make that term up.......it was taken from Vattel’s Law of Nations, where the definition is quite clear and it more than just being born on US soil.

Why was this so important? So that other countries would not have influence over the US. My gosh, we have people coming here from all over the world to drop a child and then return to their own countries and yet their child gets a US birth certificate and are considered citizens!! This is outrageous!


5 posted on 04/22/2010 5:04:52 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality: (e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.

Like Londonistan.

6 posted on 04/22/2010 7:42:38 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bttt


7 posted on 04/22/2010 10:47:25 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or ...off..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bump


8 posted on 04/22/2010 2:17:34 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or ...off..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

And the possible situations you state are exactly why the founding fathers put this in the constitution.


9 posted on 04/22/2010 2:28:57 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Founding Fathers.....grave....rolling over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

A natural born subject is a perpetual allegiance to the Crown.


10 posted on 05/03/2010 5:54:30 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson