Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nearly half the money spent at US retail on desktop PCs goes to Apple
Beta News ^ | Published November 25, 2009, | by Joe Wilcox

Posted on 11/27/2009 12:12:46 AM PST by Swordmaker

In October, Mac US retail desktop computer revenue share was 47.71, percent up from 33.44 percent a year earlier, according to NPD. It's a stunning number, given just how many Windows PC companies combined command so much more market share, while competing for the same revenue share.

NPD measures in-store and online sales to compile the numbers. Contrary to blogs or news sites that will link to this post, NPD did not issue a report with this data. I asked for it. That's what reporters do -- ask questions.

The larger questions: Can Apple sustain such high desktop dollar share? Does Apple benefit long-term from the trend? "No" is likely answer to both questions.

Stephen Baker, NPD's vice president of industry analysis, attributes some of Apple's October gains to the release of fast, new iMacs during the same month that Windows PC sales declined ahead of Windows 7's October 22nd launch. "You only really had 10 days to catch up some 20 days of lost [Windows PC] sales," Baker said.

Additionally there is the recession, which force hit following the late-September 2008 stock market crash. "You're comparing the [iMac] launch month this year to the month last year when people stopped going into stores to buy things," Baker said. "To some extent it's a little bit apples and oranges."

PC Revenue Share 09-10

He emphasized: "While those are great numbers, that's probably not sustainable." Perhaps, but even a decline to 40 percent revenue share would put Apple head and torso above every single competitor selling Windows PCs. It's worth noting that Mac desktop revenue share had already risen to 44.91 percent in April 2009, although Baker attributed some of that "pop" to the "residual effects" of new iMac upgrades a month earlier.

One factor helping Apple is average selling price. The Mac maker has largely chosen not to compete with Windows PC manufacturers below $1,000. While price wars continue at the low end among Windows PC manufacturers, Apple's entry-level iMac starts at $1,199. True, Apple offers the Mac mini for $599 or $799, but the ASP is considerably higher than comparably priced Windows PCs. Low-cost Windows PCs typically come with monitor, keyboard and mouse, which are all extra-cost items for Mac mini unless the buyer uses existing gear.

In October, the Mac desktop ASP was $1,338, down from $1,390 in April and $1,581 in October 2008, according to NPD. By comparison, Windows desktop PC ASP was $491, or nearly $900 less than the Mac desktop. Generally, Apple also captures more revenue share on much smaller sales. For example, according to Apple SEC filings, worldwide, the company shipped 3.05 million Macs -- only 787,000 of them desktops -- in third calendar quarter. By comparison, HP shipped 16.1 million PCs and Acer 12.5 million, according to Gartner.

PC ASPs 10-09

Where Apple's sales are stronger, in notebooks, it's revenue share is by no means as high -- yet still an enviable percentage for any single computer manufacturer. Mac notebook US retail revenue share was 33.66 percent in October, up from 30.07 percent in April but down from 38.13 percent in October 2008. In the year-ago month, Apple released its first unibody MacBooks and MacBook Pros, which lifted revenue share. The change in revenue share from October to April to October bookends the new Mac laptop launches and corroborates Baker's assertion that Apple revenue share will recede in coming months.

"Apple gets a huge bump out of new products that no one else gets," he said. "Those [share increases] haven't tended to be sustainable in the long term."

Maybe, but one third of sales going to one company is an amazing feat -- and it's where the market is growing fastest: Portable computers. The Mac laptop ASP also is much higher than Windows notebooks: respectively, $1,410 to $519 in October, according to NPD. Apple sells fewer units, but commands higher margins on every one than Windows PC manufacturers.

The question ahead: What about Windows 7 and the holidays? On Monday, Gartner predicted that Windows 7 wouldn't lift PC sales in 2009. That's a question to answer in January when the sales figures are final. But based on Apple's ability to defy the recession's downward pull on computer sales and just how consistently busy are the company's retail stores, I'll predict that Mac overall US retail revenue share will stay well above one-third and more than 40 percent for desktops. Surely any Windows PC competitor would want make so much on so few computers sold, comparatively.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2009 12:12:46 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
According to NPD research, Apple gets 48% of all dollars spent on Desktop computers in the US in October... PING!


NPD: US Mac Sales Kicked Butt in Ocotober Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 11/27/2009 12:17:10 AM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Key words seem to be “on so few...” It appears that units sold tells a different story.


3 posted on 11/27/2009 12:24:28 AM PST by Ingtar (Asses far Left of me; Rinos to the Left; FReepin' on the Right with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
It appears that units sold tells a different story.

You can't spend "units"...

4 posted on 11/27/2009 12:41:35 AM PST by WVKayaker (www.wherezobama.org / Obama's Excellent Adventure ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

apple spends more on parts,research than PC makers,hence they last longer..but soon become obsolete,you cannot install newer software on PPC from 5 years ago

the PC is becoming expendable,check out Microcenter prices,emachines with Win 7 for $250


5 posted on 11/27/2009 1:25:44 AM PST by wiseone (india)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wiseone
.but soon become obsolete,

That depends on your definition of "is".

I have Mac computers going back to 1984 that still function as they were designed. I have PPC's with G4's starting at 400mhz, which function fine under OSX 10.4. I blend OSX 10.4,5,6 on a local network with the 400 G4 as the server running 10.4 server...

Just because it doesn't boot the latest version does not mean it doesn't work. I also own six cars over 20 years old. Obsolete? No, lovingly used!

6 posted on 11/27/2009 2:16:15 AM PST by WVKayaker (www.wherezobama.org / Obama's Excellent Adventure ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wiseone
apple spends more on parts,research than PC makers,hence they last longer..but soon become obsolete,you cannot install newer software on PPC from 5 years ago

Currently, the only software you cannot install on the PowerPC Macs is OS X.6 Snow Leopard. Almost all of the third party software will run on it so far. That WILL change in the future as more and more is written for Intel Macs only. In addition, there are some that are working on a virtual PPC machine for the Intel that will keep the older stuff alive on the newer Macs. The Intel Macs represent about 70% of the Macs in the Wild right now because Apple has been selling around 9 million a year since the switch to intel... and in another year that will be over 85%. Also, the older software will still work fine on the older machines.

7 posted on 11/27/2009 2:23:17 AM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wiseone
the PC is becoming expendable,check out Microcenter prices,emachines with Win 7 for $250

I think the word you're looking for is "disposable."

8 posted on 11/27/2009 3:32:10 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I think Apple sales have remained strong because users of older PowerPC Macs switched over to Intel Macs in a big way to prevent finding themselves useless due to future MacOS X versions going Intel-only support. I've read that MacOS X 10.7--of which early alpha builds probably exist inside Apple's development labs--may run on Intel CPU's only for maximum code optimization reasons.

Hardware-wise, Apple iMacs and Mac Pros are excellent machines, though I wish Apple would provide more ergonomic keyboards and mouse pointers (I hope Logitech develops an Apple-specific version of the Desktop Wave Pro keyboard/mouse combination).

9 posted on 11/27/2009 5:02:48 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseone

Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs is the co-founder and CEO of Apple and Pixar.

Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.” - Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs regularly makes most rosters of the rich and powerful. It is surprising for a guy who takes home an annual salary of U.S. $1. The reasons why he is on all power lists are; Apple, Next, iPod and Pixar. Jobs is also known as the one man who could have upstaged Bill Gates. But Jobs was as excited about innovation as Bill Gates was interested in making money.

Steve Jobs was born in Green Bay, Wisconsin to Joanne Simpson and an Egyptian Arab father. Paul and Clara Jobs of Mountain View, Santa Clara County, California then adopted him. The writer Mona Simpson is Jobs’ biological sister. In 1972, Jobs graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, California and enrolled in Reed College in Portland, Oregon. One semester later he had dropped out. But instead of going back home he hung around college and took up the study of philosophy and foreign cultures.

Steve Jobs had a deep-seated interest in technology so he took up a job at Atari Inc. which was a leading manufacturer of video games. He struck a friendship with fellow designer Steve Wozniak and attended meetings of the “Homebrew Computer Club” with him. Wozniak and Jobs developed a system with a toy whistle available in the Cap’n Crunch cereal box to make it possible to make free long distance telephone calls. They called off the amateur venture after someone told them of the possible legal consequences.

After saving up some money Steve Jobs took off for India in the search of enlightenment with his friend Dan Kottke. Once he returned he convinced Wozniak to quit his job at Hewlett Packard and join him in his venture that concerned personal computers. They sold items like a scientific calculator to raise the seed capital.

In 1976, Jobs, then 21, and Wozniak, 26, founded Apple Computer Co. in the Jobs family garage. The first personal computer was sold for $666.66. By 1980, Apple had already released three improved versions of the personal computer. It had a wildly successful IPO, which made both founders millionaires many times over. Steve Jobs had managed to rope in John Scully of Pepsi to head the marketing function in Apple.

A tiff with the Apple board and John Scully led to the resignation of Steve Jobs. As soon as he resigned he immersed himself in his brand new venture. Steve Jobs decided that he wanted to change the hardware industry. The company was called NeXTStep and the new machine was called NeXT Computer. He ploughed in more than U.S. $250 million into the company. The machine was a commercial washout but it did help in object-oriented programming, PostScript, and magneto-optical devices. Tim Berners-Lee developed the original World Wide Web system at CERN on a NeXT machine. Bitterly disappointed with NeXTStep, Jobs accepted the offer that Apple made him.

Steve Jobs also started Pixar Inc., which has gone on to produce animated movies such as Toy Story (1995); A Bug’s Life (1998); Toy Story 2 (1999); Monsters, Inc. (2001); Finding Nemo (2003); and The Incredibles (2004). This venture has made him one of the most sought after men in Hollywood.

Post Pixar, Steve Jobs wanted another round of revolutionizing to do. This time it was the music industry. He introduced the iPod in 2003. Later he came up with iTunes, which was a digital jukebox. A million and a half iPods later, the music industry still does not know whether this invention will save it or destroy it. Apple has a great advertising track record and its ‘Rip, Mix, Burn’ campaign was another feather in its cap. Now the industry uses a Mac to make the music and an iPod to store it.

Steve Jobs lives with his wife, Laurene Powell and their three children in Silicon Valley. He also has a daughter, Lisa Jobs from a previous relationship. In 2004, there was a cancerous tumor in his pancreas, which was successfully operated upon.

Milestones

Videos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1R-jKKp3NA

Above:

Steve Jobs delivering his commencement speech to the graduates of Stanford University in 2005
Added: 1/15/09

Sources

1. The 25 Most Influential People on the Web

10 posted on 11/27/2009 6:17:16 AM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Apple had the first good deal I ever saw. At Best Buy they had their 13.3 inch Apple laptop for the usual high price of $999. But with the purchase you got a $150 BB gift card. That’s as good as it gets with the Jesse Jobs Gang.

Now if you had half a brain and you wanted in on this bonanza you went to BB a few days ago and bought one for $999. Then today you would go back to BB and return it then immediately buy it back and get the $150 gift card.

I passed on this and got a new LCD and laser printer instead


11 posted on 11/27/2009 7:05:43 AM PST by dennisw (Obama -- our very own loopy, leftist god-thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

See. Monopolies usually are profitable.

12 posted on 11/27/2009 7:08:36 AM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; Swordmaker
You were saying ...

See. Monopolies usually are profitable.

Kinda difficult to be a monopoly when you only have about 10% of the market in this country... LOL...

13 posted on 11/27/2009 7:12:55 AM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I have read the transcript of his commencement speech. It is really good. Much better than the one I got that is for sure.


14 posted on 11/27/2009 7:35:10 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I wonder if all of the people who say Apple is dumb for not lowering their prices and competing in the entire market will show up to this thread.


15 posted on 11/27/2009 7:35:48 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I think part of what we’re seeing here is the decline of the desktop computer.

People just don’t buy them as much anymore. Laptops and netbooks is where the market is moving.


16 posted on 11/27/2009 7:42:50 AM PST by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde
I wonder if all of the people who say Apple is dumb for not lowering their prices

Apple was dumb for not lowering their prices during the Vista debacle. Now it doesn't matter nearly as much, since Windows 7 appears to be a pretty good operating system.

Apple and its fanboys are ok with 10 percent market share. I doubt it will drop much below that unless the economy gets a whole lot worse. My suggestion was to move beyond a niche market of fanboys, but if you're happy with a perpetual ten percent, more power to you.
17 posted on 11/27/2009 7:47:44 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I would imagine they are happy with ever increasing profit regardless of market share. That would seem to be what the company is most interested in. Why try to slug it out to sell 7 cheap computers when you can just try to sell one?


18 posted on 11/27/2009 8:22:02 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wiseone
"the PC is becoming expendable,check out Microcenter prices,emachines with Win 7 for $250"

Interesting punctuation there.

There is no comparison between the $250 low-end eMachines and any Mac. Apple chooses not to play in the commodity basement, and chooses not to subsidize its prices with gigabytes of performance-sapping preloaded crapware. Profitability, for some silly reason, is important to them. It funds R&D, for example, and lets them expand into new markets and new ways of doing business. Look at competitors like HP-- round after round after round of layoffs, leaving them with a sickly product line composed of me-too products, and no company left.

By the way, the Mac Mini at around $600 is a really nice desktop machine, not at all stripper in functionality, performance or reliability, and with no crapware. The new iMacs are fantastic, too, and very well priced considering their benchmarks. But down at the bloody bottom of the marketplace, down in layoff land, Apple is wisely leaving it to others to decimate themselves.
19 posted on 11/27/2009 11:39:26 AM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
"I think Apple sales have remained strong because users of older PowerPC Macs switched over to Intel Macs in a big way to prevent finding themselves useless due to future MacOS X versions going Intel-only support."

That's an interesting thought but does not compare at all with my own observations or experience. Here in RightOnTheLeftCoast Manor, for my family and work we have (let's see...) three PowerPC Macs, two Intel Macs, two Win 7 PCs, three Win XP machines, four Linux PCs, two 68k Macs, and a Sun Sparcstation 2. All are running and doing their jobs, some (can you guess which?) with more hassle than others due to malware infestations, despite all precautions. Our older Macs are running flawlessly, and we have had no sense of urgency to upgrade. And such is the case with my Mac-using friends and colleagues.

Near as I can tell, your contention of Mac sales propelled by upgrades has no basis in reality. If you have a citation to support your notion, please post it.
20 posted on 11/27/2009 11:47:36 AM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson