In future, could you please preface these historical articles with the word “history”? For about the 10th time, now, I have been unnerved by seeing something that I thought was current news—which would be insanely bad news if it was current news. And just ambiguous enough so it theoretically *might* be current news.
Sorry pal, but you'll need an IQ above room temperature to "play" here at Free Republic.
If after TEN TIMES the numbers "(11/19/39)" still mean nothing to you... well, maybe you'd want to consider repeating some of your schooling -- how about the third grade? ;-)
I’m real late to this party since I was locked away typing master’s papers. With all due respect, if the date in the title doesn’t clue you in I’m afraid the word “history” will be lost on you too.
These threads have been going on now for TWO years on this site. So far you are the only person who keeps thinking they are current events.