And a UK birth certificate issued in 2005 looks like this:
This actually brings up a very serious question.
If and when Obama DOES produce a "long form birth certificate," how is anyone going to know that whatever he produces is not a forgery?
To the naked eye, this particular faked "document" looks pretty convincing.
Here's the potential key evidence, as far as I'm concerned.
Point 1: The COLB posted on Obama's web site may or may not be phony (I haven't decided on that point yet.)
Point 2: Obama's failure to come up with a real, long form birth certificate in a timely manner, and his expenditure of a vast amount of money in legal fees is, in my opinion, a 100% indication that something is rotten in Denmark. I don't know what that something is, but something is fishy.
Point 3: Government officials and the media have stalled, obfuscated, gone to court, ridiculed those who've asked for reasonable proof (even giving them their own insulting label: "birthers"), and changed their story.
If you're in a police investigation, the suspect declining to prove his innocence when it should be very easy to do so, and changing his or her story under further questioning, is a sure sign that something is not innocent.
So the key evidence for me, at this point, is the history of the thing to this point.
I guess that about sums it up.
If and when Obama DOES produce a "long form birth certificate," how is anyone going to know that whatever he produces is not a forgery?
To the naked eye, this particular faked "document" looks pretty convincing.
Pinging Marmolade.
And a UK birth certificate issued in 2005 looks like this: