[Doug TX]

Who cares?...isn’t that what democrats say?

[mojo114]

So you felt the need to start a thread because..
l. you want us to see it again this has been posted before
2.you hate Chambliss
3.you are a troll
4.you are fascinated by a picture out of context

What say you?

[gatorhead]

Good God man, get ahold of yourself!

[Maelstorm]

I don’t care what the left is peddling. Chambliss won big and they can go find a quiet urine reeking bathroom to piss away their tears and share a little love with their special friends.

[epow]

I live in GA and I didn't hear or see anything about this so-called "grope" until today. After watching the video (HERE) I thinks it's perfectly obvious to any unbiased observer that Chambliss innocently placed his hand on the little girl's chest while hugging her at the close of the video. Not even the most incredibly stupid politician on earth would deliberately grope his little granddaughter on a statewide televised TV spot. Personally I'm not a big Chambliss fan, but even if I were a rabid supporter of his opponent Martin I could plainly see that the so-called "grope" was purely accidental.

OTOH, I have no doubt whatsoever that the desperate Martin people would have tried any smear tactic against Chambliss that they thought they could get away with. The Dems were desperately wanting to get a filibuster proof Senate in order to gain total control of the national government in league with their cohort Obamassiah, and after Chambliss's win that's now out of their reach even if the MN clown beats out Coleman in a recount.

[all the best]

Only the overly-sexualized would se anything but a grandfatherly hug. This is definitely in the mind of the beholder.

[Ghengis]

Watching the video, I have to wonder about anyone that would consider that a “grope.”