Skip to comments.
New findings reveal that the shape of the Universe is a Dodecahedron based on Phi
Weird News ^
| 9/08
Posted on 09/28/2008 12:26:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: The_Reader_David; SunkenCiv; neverdem; Physicist; RightWhale
Like, *PING*, dudes.
David, thanks, bookmarked for later.
Cheers!
41
posted on
09/28/2008 7:29:32 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: LibWhacker
A dodecahedron?
Somewhere there's a REALLY REALLY REALLY big Dungeon Master rolling our universe around to determine damage from a long spear against a frost giant.
42
posted on
09/28/2008 7:38:20 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
To: grey_whiskers; SunkenCiv; neverdem; Physicist; RightWhale; LibWhacker
43
posted on
09/28/2008 7:50:41 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
To: The_Reader_David
44
posted on
09/28/2008 8:13:06 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: snarks_when_bored
Like, *PING*, dude.
Sorry I forgot you earlier... :-(
45
posted on
09/28/2008 8:29:32 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: The_Reader_David
Do you have another link? That link came up “unavailable on this server.”
46
posted on
09/28/2008 8:49:17 PM PDT
by
ottbmare
To: LibWhacker
The standard model of cosmology predicts that the universe is infinite and flat.The standard model of cosmology has been shown to be in err some 45 years ago. While the information in this article is adds to our knowledge of the universe, it is not as much of a paradigm shift as the title and opening paragraph suggest.
47
posted on
09/28/2008 8:53:56 PM PDT
by
mlocher
(USA is a sovereign state.)
To: ottbmare
48
posted on
09/28/2008 9:10:45 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
To: ottbmare
49
posted on
09/28/2008 9:11:49 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
To: 6SJ7; LibWhacker
“Their ‘small’, closed universe should be about 30 billion light years across.”
Yet the universe estimated at 14.5 billion years old. Expansion faster then light, which they say is impossible, or a pre-existing cell being filled in by the Big Bang. Interesting choices.
“If the universe has a boundary, doesn’t that imply a frame of reference external to the universe? That would seem to violate the concept of universe.”
But not of universeS.
In fact if this theory has validity, infinite stacks of universes seem a reasonable assumption.
50
posted on
09/28/2008 9:25:16 PM PDT
by
tlb
To: Kevmo
Interesting. Thanks for the ping!
To: r9etb
my favorite irrational number
52
posted on
09/29/2008 9:42:41 AM PDT
by
fnord
(If gun owners, pot smokers, and poker players start a political party, they'd never lose an election)
To: grey_whiskers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson