Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Postal Dude

Did the Nazi’s take control of the means of production within the state? Case closed.


4 posted on 01/18/2008 11:34:29 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

Do Socialists deem other races [Mexicans, Afro-Americans] SUBHUMAN?

Case closed.


15 posted on 01/18/2008 11:48:30 AM PST by Postal Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

Pournelle chart

 

Image:Pournelle chart color.gif

Was looking for the straight line graph that I saw years ago in a political science text.


30 posted on 01/18/2008 12:01:58 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

Actually, even though I don’t agree with the original poster, this is an interesting post. Your comment about NAZIS taking over the means of production needs to be elaborated on. From whhat I have read, the NAZIS unlike the Marxists (Stalinists by then), allowed private ownership, but basically manipulated those owners of corporations to do its bidding. It seems that a person was allowed to have personal capital and own private property unlike in collectivist Russia. In regard to race/ethnicity the NAZIS saw the Aryan/Nordic race as being superior. Communism in its essence is not racist, it’s a one world mindset. I think that what ever racism there was in the Soviet Union stemmed from pre-existing Russian biases. Same with every other communist regime that went after particular ethnic groups for eradication. The subject of homosexuality is an interesting from both the NAZI perspective and the Communist perspective. It was commonly known that the upper echclons of Hitler’s posse had many homo-erotic inclinations. There is stuff written on this. Even though they sent gays to the extermination camps they had this other stuff going on in private-—think of the type of super macho gay variant. Communists also have never been fond of homosexuals. It doesn’t stem so much from a moral perspective (obviously, but possibly from a psycho-social one. Maybe it was because they saw homosexuals as too self indulgent, individualistic, not going to procreate new workers to enhance the well being of the state-—whatever, commies weren’t all hot for homosexuality. I guess there is stuff written about this too.


53 posted on 01/18/2008 12:59:00 PM PST by brooklyn dave ("I'll take Manhattan, the Bronx and Staten Island Too" LALALALA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson