Yes it is. You resort to it whenever you can't argue the facts of a thread. Pointing out a lie you made about someone isn't a defense of their philosophy, it's a correction of your lie.
I myself have stated that Groklaw is great if you only read the documents and avoid the editorials, so any attack you make on PJ's credibility is merely a distraction. You have never successfully attacked the credibility of the posted documents, so you go off on a sideline rant about the editor's beliefs.
But you still lose because the facts of the case are against you, as always. Your attempts to bring up leftist strawmen so you can knock them down are pathetic. Your attempts to libel Torvalds are even worse.
If you can't argue the facts of the thread then quit posting. As with last time, I have lost patience since it doesn't appear you'll slither away like you did the last two times you were proven wrong. I won't reply again unless you can actually argue the facts of the thread.
More lies from the antiRepublican in defense of his "leftist loons" LOL. Here's the thread again (notice I'm the only one ever linking any facts again), which includes near the end someone else who attests Jokelaw is leftist drivel BS.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1801886/posts