Let the discussion begin.
To: mainepatsfan; scott says; MikefromOhio
2 posted on
09/12/2006 2:22:10 PM PDT by
Cyclopean Squid
(Clockwatcher Extraordinaire)
To: ABG(anybody but Gore); akorahil; albee; A message; andyland; Argh; b4its2late; BADROTOFINGER; ...
To: Cyclopean Squid
Decent chance the Raiders and Packers will each finish 0 -16.
5 posted on
09/12/2006 2:25:03 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Cyclopean Squid
The only way I can figure that the Radiers are not last is that ESPN doesn't want to have to remember that stinker last night. They didn't even have 100 yards total offense!
Granted it hurts me greatly to see the Pack 32nd, but come on...!
6 posted on
09/12/2006 2:25:57 PM PDT by
MNlurker
To: Cyclopean Squid
sorry, but the fact that pittsburgh beat the dolphins(my team) hardly merits a #1. dante suckpepper is no better than he was last season(before injury).
8 posted on
09/12/2006 2:26:46 PM PDT by
pipecorp
( muhammed .....................8(_o_)8 .................p b & j mercy is wasted on the merciless.)
To: Cyclopean Squid
Seattle at no. 3? Don't think so. On another note, the Ravens really were not on my radar before last week but they were very impressive. The AFC has so many elite teams right now. The NFC has quire a bit of catching up to do.
12 posted on
09/12/2006 2:29:12 PM PDT by
Dysart
To: Cyclopean Squid
Seattle is WAY to high. That performance should have put them out of the top ten.
13 posted on
09/12/2006 2:29:55 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: Cyclopean Squid
Oh no...ESPN has my lowly Rams sitting at 18.
Fortunately, I put about as much stock in ESPN's opinions as I do polls.
15 posted on
09/12/2006 2:32:33 PM PDT by
demsux
To: Cyclopean Squid
Total overreaction on all counts. Teams that lost are still good (Carolina), teams that won are still bad (Jets.)
20 posted on
09/12/2006 2:35:34 PM PDT by
Terpfen
(And in the second year, Nick Saban said "Let there be a franchise quarterback...")
To: Cyclopean Squid
Patriots at #10? Fine. Underestimate them as usual. We'll see you at the Superbowl.
32 posted on
09/12/2006 2:42:26 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Cyclopean Squid
The Chargers and Bears are too low. Pittsburg, Colts, and Seatle are too high. At least based on week 1 performance.
To: Cyclopean Squid
I guess the Patriots must suck. I'll have to stop watching.
36 posted on
09/12/2006 2:43:22 PM PDT by
Poser
(Willing to fight for oil)
To: Cyclopean Squid
80 posted on
09/12/2006 3:22:15 PM PDT by
xpertskir
(Media, the plural of mediocrity)
To: Cyclopean Squid
This subjective ranking stuff is fun for discussion, but I'm so glad that the only criteria for the best teams in pro-football is objective: WINS and LOSSES.
120 posted on
09/14/2006 12:21:32 AM PDT by
Lexinom
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
