Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rat study shows dirty better than clean
AP on Yahoo ^ | 6/16/06 | Seth Borenstien - ap

Posted on 06/16/2006 1:03:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - Gritty rats and mice living in sewers and farms seem to have healthier immune systems than their squeaky clean cousins that frolic in cushy antiseptic labs, two studies indicate.

The lesson for humans: Clean living may make us sick.

The studies give more weight to a 17-year-old theory that the sanitized Western world may be partly to blame for soaring rates of human allergy and asthma cases and some autoimmune diseases, such as Type I diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. The theory, called the hygiene hypothesis, figures that people's immune systems aren't being challenged by disease and dirt early in life, so the body's natural defenses overreact to small irritants such as pollen.

The new studies, one of which was published Friday in the peer reviewed Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, found significant differences in the immune systems between euthanized wild and lab rodents.

When the immune cells in the wild rats are stimulated by researchers, "they just don't do anything they sit there; if you give them same stimulus to the lab rats, they go crazy," said study co-author Dr. William Parker, a Duke University professor of experimental surgery. He compared lab rodents to more than 50 wild rats and mice captured and killed in cities and farms.

Also, the wild mice and rats had as much as four times higher levels of immunoglobulins, yet weren't sick, showing an immune system tuned to fight crucial germs, but not minor irritants, Parker said. He said what happened in the lab rats is what likely occurs in humans: their immune systems have got it so cushy they overreact to smallest of problems.

"Your immune system is like the person who lives in the perfect house and has all the food they want, you're going to start worrying about the little things like someone stepping on your flowers," Parker said.

Challenged immune systems — such as kids who grow up with two or more pets — don't tend to develop as many allergies, said Dr. Stanley Goldstein, director of Allergy & Asthma Care of Long Island.

Parker said his study has drawbacks because he can't be sure that the age of the wild and lab rodents are equivalent, although he estimates the ages based on weight. He also could not control what happened in the past to the wild rats to see if they had unusual diseases before being captured and killed.

It would have been more useful had Parker studied extremely young wild rodents because, according to the hygiene hypothesis, that's when the protection from dirty living starts, said Dr. Stuart Levy, director of the Center for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance at Tufts University.

Human epidemiological studies have long given credence to the hygiene theory, showing that allergy and asthma rates were higher in the cleaner industrialized areas than in places such as Africa. Parker's studies, looking at animal differences, may eventually help scientists find when, where and how environmental exposure help protect against future allergies and immune disorders, said Goldstein, and Dr. Jeffrey Platt of the Mayo Clinic in Minn., both of whom were not part of Parker's studies.

Parker said he hopes to build a 50-foot artificial sewer for his next step, so that he could introduce the clean lab rats to an artificial dirty environment and see how and when the immunity was activated.

That may be the biggest thing to come out of the wild and lab rodent studies, Platt said: "Then all of a sudden it becomes possible to expose people to the few things (that exercise the immune system) and gives them the benefit of the dirty environment without having to expose them to the dirt."


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Pets/Animals; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: better; clean; dirty; health; hormesis; rat; study

1 posted on 06/16/2006 1:03:11 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Something I think is important to consider but didn't see mentioned in this article is the genetic lineage of the two groups of rats.

Obviously, most wild rats are descended from ancestry that have adapted to a dirty environment, but what of the lab rats? Were they from stock that has been bred in captivity for generations, or were they (or at least their parents) captured in the wild and transplanted into a 'clean' habitat?

I'd look into this possibility of genetic drift before I went off on a tangent tinged with Lamarck-like leanings.
2 posted on 06/16/2006 1:13:47 PM PDT by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Rat study shows dirty better than clean"

I thought this article would be about lib's and their personal hygiene (or lack thereof).
3 posted on 06/16/2006 1:21:20 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

The next thing to do is capture wild rats and raise them in captivity for a few generations.

I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system.


4 posted on 06/16/2006 1:23:44 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system.

I stand corrected regarding invoking Lamarck in this case. It will be very interesting to see what will come out of more controlled studies such as the one you suggest.

5 posted on 06/16/2006 1:41:23 PM PDT by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Your immune system is like the person who lives in the perfect house and has all the food they want, you're going to start worrying about the little things like someone stepping on your flowers," Parker said.

Interestingly, this hypothesis goes a long way towards explaining why some clueless rich Americans become Democrats, make a big stink about global warming, and work assiduously to undermine truth, justice, and the American way...

6 posted on 06/16/2006 1:52:26 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No wonder I'm so healthy. I grew up on a farm, went and played in the barn, came in and ate without washing my hands, picked stuff up off the floor and ate it... ROTFL... I'm truly a barbarian, still. But a healthy one.


7 posted on 06/16/2006 2:17:06 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Parker said he hopes to build a 50-foot artificial sewer for his next step, so that he could introduce the clean lab rats to an artificial dirty environment and see how and when the immunity was activated.

Bwa-ha, bwa-hahahahaha! What a dumb idea!

Wild rats just utilize their immune systems, hence, they have strong immune systems.

8 posted on 06/16/2006 2:28:48 PM PDT by Sarajevo (Life is a sexually transmitted disease. -R. D. Laing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

I'm also curious about why I'm not tormented by allergies continually since I have two cats (which I'm allergic to on a skin test). I read something saying that this could lead to such high levels of IgG that the allergen is all grabbed and pulled out before the IgE can get into the action. I'm rather curious about this but information is hard to come by.


9 posted on 06/16/2006 2:45:55 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What is missing is

1) genetics. Lab mice are interbred

2) sewer rats probably are the few survivors of a large litter. So weak sewer rats died as babies. This is not true of lab rats.


10 posted on 06/16/2006 3:21:11 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
yes this did wonder for middle ages

one knows that was the pinnacle of European cleanliness
11 posted on 06/16/2006 7:05:00 PM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

"I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system."


Service plumbing shops will tell you that service plumbers seem to have very few colds, flu etc.


12 posted on 06/16/2006 9:22:26 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
Actually, the more valuable experiment is the one they're planning, which is to take the lab rats and place them in a more "natural" environment. They could then be compared to their genetically identical control lab rats that are still in the clean environment. This way, the genetic differences are eliminated, they can be age and sex matched and therefore any differences in the development of resistance to stimulation of the immune system could more confidently be claimed to be due to environmental factors.

As for Lamarck, epigenetics is starting to show the poor devil may not have been as wrong as has been thought!

13 posted on 06/16/2006 11:03:49 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Liz; Howlin; MurryMom
RAT study shows dirty better than clean


14 posted on 06/17/2006 2:37:58 PM PDT by Libloather (They can't privatize Social Security but they can find a way to give it to illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Are you trying to scare me to death???


15 posted on 06/17/2006 2:42:29 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Sorry. Those WERE the 'clean' photos!

I really do hope everything is well with you and yours...

16 posted on 06/17/2006 2:57:48 PM PDT by Libloather (They can't privatize Social Security but they can find a way to give it to illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Liz; MurryMom
And what, exactly, is that donkey doing to *Squirt's head?


17 posted on 06/17/2006 3:02:31 PM PDT by Libloather (They can't privatize Social Security but they can find a way to give it to illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson