To: Antonello
The next thing to do is capture wild rats and raise them in captivity for a few generations.
I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system.
4 posted on
06/16/2006 1:23:44 PM PDT by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
To: ahayes
I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system.
I stand corrected regarding invoking Lamarck in this case. It will be very interesting to see what will come out of more controlled studies such as the one you suggest.
5 posted on
06/16/2006 1:41:23 PM PDT by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: ahayes
"I tend to think that the hygiene hypothesis is true. Nothing Lamarckian about it, just environmental effects on the immune system."
Service plumbing shops will tell you that service plumbers seem to have very few colds, flu etc.
12 posted on
06/16/2006 9:22:26 PM PDT by
ansel12
To: ahayes
Actually, the more valuable experiment is the one they're planning, which is to take the lab rats and place them in a more "natural" environment. They could then be compared to their genetically identical control lab rats that are still in the clean environment. This way, the genetic differences are eliminated, they can be age and sex matched and therefore any differences in the development of resistance to stimulation of the immune system could more confidently be claimed to be due to environmental factors.
As for Lamarck, epigenetics is starting to show the poor devil may not have been as wrong as has been thought!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson