Posted on 05/14/2024 8:35:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
Kaitlan Collins @kaitlancollins
A New York appeals court has just denied Trump's motion challenging his gag order. "We find that Justice Merchan properly weighed petitioner’s First Amendment Rights against the court’s historical commitment to ensuring the fair administration of justice in criminal cases..."
9:57 AM · May 14, 2024
·
64.6K
Views
New York seems to be sick from stem to stern. further appeal needed for historical precedent
“..historical commitment to ensuring the fair administration of justice in criminal cases...”
How many lies are in that one sentence?
Of course they do…
As said before...time to expel New York from the Union.
There’s nothing American about the place.
appeal to scotus
Illogical decision. Just because it has “historical precedent” does not mean it’s right. Historical precedent can mean it rains sometimes on the weekend. Historical precedent IS NOT A LAW.
They should have ruled on a law that you can articulate.
Poor decision, just a continuation of NY LAWFARE.
Is that the next step from this NY Appeals court?
May it be requested on an expedited basis (not that the USSC has to take it or move fast)?
There is no law in New Jerk state - bring your own mercenaries if you have to deal with the NY cartel black-robed clowns.
President Trump is engaged in multi front lawfare in NY, DC and Florida. The big show at the moment is the immunity case before SCOTUS
Central to Trump argument is that immunity was intended to prevent malicious prosecution of a President after they have left office.
This is exactly what is happening to Trump right now and you can bet the Justices are watching the various miscarriages of justice and abuses of our court system very closely.
The more over the top and insanely the Democrats pushed this, the greater the pressure on the Supreme Court to reign things in
“fair administration of justice in criminal cases” means FAIR TO THE DEFENDANT, not the Judge, his familia or the prosecution. The total opposite of what these whacked-out NY courts seem to think. This is not due process of law; this is dictatorial edict.
Yes, that is NY's highest court.
Why anyone stays in NY state is beyond me!
Are there any redeeming qualities, other than the landscape of the upstate?
Would be tuff to get a Writ of Cert granted unless SCOTUS believes this type of situation will rear its ugly head again & again repeatedly in other cases
The Democrat Party Organized Crime Syndicate includes judges.
Anything South of the Catskills is a no go zone.
-PJ
no- you’re misunderstanding. we need an appeal to a higher court that follows the law to put precedent on the books.this garbage from inbred NY political judges is typical and i imagine, expected. onward.
Historical. Historical, you know. Like Dred Scott.
Whenever my empathy for New York hits rock bottom, they always manage to dig a little deeper.
In addition it’s redundancy, basing a decision or ruling on “historical precedent” is a not-so-clever way of saying, “If you don’t like the ruling, don’t blame me!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.