Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2-Year-Old Taken From Mother Because She Didn't Give Him Rash Medicine
Rumble Via Liberty Daily ^ | 26 February 2024 | Staff

Posted on 02/26/2024 8:57:33 AM PST by Red Badger

VIDEO AT LINK...................

BACKGROUND:

SOURCE: https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1761205901170753538

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Post

See new posts

Conversation

Wall Street Apes

@WallStreetApes

What’s Happening In America? 🚨 Texas Woman Has Her 2 Year Old Child Taken Away For Being Hesitant About The Medication Doctors Were Recommending

“CPS took him without a court order and without police officers seeing an immediate need for his removal”

“The boy's mother says that she never imagined that taking him to the hospital for a rash would end with him being taken away from her the very next day, and her court hearing is still a week away. I've never been away from my son for more than a few hours prior to this incident and has now been 60 days.”

“She took her 2 year old son, Josiah, to Children's Medical Center Dallas because her son had a rash that she believed was a reaction to a new laundry detergent.

And I realized that his foot was swelling, so, um, I took him to the hospital based on a referral from his pediatrician.

She says the doctor recommended a medicine she was not comfortable with.

I just was not okay with giving him clindamycin since that antibiotic is reserved for more severe infections.

Sanders decided to leave the hospital against medical advice to take Josiah to her pediatrician, which she did. Even so, the next afternoon, CPS officers came to her apartment accompanied by Corinth police. Chief Jerry Gardner told me by phone what his officers observed.”

VIDEO AT LINK..........................


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: dallas; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2024 8:57:33 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Your children belong to the State. It is the New Order of things.


2 posted on 02/26/2024 9:00:06 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
In another time there would be retribution.

I would have given the kid otc Benadryl, but taking the kid to his doctor trumps that.

3 posted on 02/26/2024 9:04:24 AM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

All parents of minor children need to treat a visit from CPS just as they would a visit from the police asking entry without a search warrant. Demand proof of right of entry. Say nothing. Demand the presence of an attorney. Always view the visit as a hostile one. Never consent to place yourself under CPS jurisdiction without court proceedings.

Know Your Rights. They will be spelled out in statute but the CPS will rely on you not knowing them. Be aware of agents who mistake guidelines “You should” for laws “You shall.” Get everything in writing.


4 posted on 02/26/2024 9:38:06 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This could also be about the CPS worker not believing she could care for her child because of her (the mom) being in a wheelchair. The mom may have a very good cause for legal action under ADA and any state anti-discrimination laws.


5 posted on 02/26/2024 9:41:00 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
All parents of minor children need to treat a visit from CPS just as they would a visit from the police asking entry without a search warrant. Demand proof of right of entry.

Generally good advice, but CPS doesn't have any "right" to entry; what they have is the power. I witnessed this as a young child (not so long ago) when my parents decided to (continue to) homeschool me when I reached the mandatory attendance age. We were new to the area and they came down on us like wolves. Fortunately my folks were what you'd call connected and managed to scare them off, but I will never forget what was said by the CPS person. Basically you either open the door and let CPS in or the cops will come and force you within five minutes, and after that it won't go well for you. Resistance...jail. Not long after, a family friend who was a judge (with 5 kids of his own) said even he was afraid of them, they hold ALL the cards.

These days you should think twice before taking your child to the doctor*, never mind the public school.

*Homeschool required a medical exam, where I got thisclose to getting a Gardasil shot without parental permission -- doctor insisted on examination without parent presence.

Don't trust anyone anymore.

6 posted on 02/26/2024 10:16:13 AM PST by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Never ever let anyone who works for any level of government into your home without a warrant.

Ever.

L


7 posted on 02/26/2024 10:17:49 AM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

CPS and other such agencies want you to believe they have a fiat to exercise their authority. They do not. They are subject to limitations spelled out in statute. Since such can be tricky to navigate an attorney (family law) should be called if they show up at your door claiming an emergency to remove a child or to even enter to “make sure” the child is o.k.

An imminent threat to a child’s life, health, and/or safety is considered reason for immediate removal. But even that requires legal action by behalf and due process rights for the parents.

In this case a doctor outright lied because he or she did not agree with the mom exercising her right to refuse a specific (but not the only available) medical treatment for her child. The claim the child was likely to develop sepsis seems not to have any medical evidence supporting it. Especially since he was in the regular care of a family doctor. And people wonder why the medical profession is no longer held in the high esteem it once was.


8 posted on 02/26/2024 10:34:31 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

One cannot, I repeat cannot say that loud enough.

Also never voluntarily place yourself under the jurisdiction of any government agency. Getting out from it may prove to be impossible.


9 posted on 02/26/2024 10:36:18 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Last I knew it’s the position of at least ACS (NYC cps) that there is no right to an attorney during investigations and questioning, as they are “civil” in nature, even though there is a program for indigents to get counsel for the court proceedings.


10 posted on 02/26/2024 10:42:08 AM PST by Right Wing Vegan (The one most called "dangerous" by minions of the pot normalization conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yep, ever closer to Plato’s sick dream.


11 posted on 02/26/2024 10:43:39 AM PST by Right Wing Vegan (The one most called "dangerous" by minions of the pot normalization conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Vegan

I would think someone would challenge that position. How they can argue it is a civil matter when a person is in danger of being jailed, having their minor children removed, and put involuntarily under state jurisdiction is beyond me.

Again, I want to emphasize CPS (or such) rely on people not being aware of the rights they have at EVERY stage of their dealing with CPS.


12 posted on 02/26/2024 11:00:50 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Vegan

FYI

https://www.novilaw.com/2019/06/crucial-rights/

5 Crucial Rights to Protect if CPS Comes Knocking


13 posted on 02/26/2024 11:06:54 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m thinking the doctor and/or the hospital did a white blood count and determined that there was an infection, not just an allergic reaction.

Rash and swelling could be an allergic reaction but could also be a serious infection.

I’m thinking the doctors and CPS might be right in this case and may have just saved the kids life. But would want to know more evidence than presented in the article.

Still, they should explain further their logic to the mother and give the child back after his infection is cleared.


14 posted on 02/26/2024 11:12:18 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

They err on the side of caution, citing the safety/security/best interest of the child. Every time. If they’re wrong, they get a pass. Every time.
And after they get a pass, they keep whatever data they collected in the process of invading your privacy. There’s a file on you the parent. They get a pass for that too.
You answer their questions (the right and accepted answers), or they will take your child. If they take your child first and ask questions later, they get a pass for that too.
Since my first encounter I have seen what others have experienced. Most people my age have young children and many have run into CPS.


15 posted on 02/26/2024 11:32:29 AM PST by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

I’ve had a run in with CPS too. I informed the investigator she could not enter but that I would bring the child (grandson) outside for her to see. I told her that her demand that my son go for drug testing (since it was based on guidelines and not law) was a no go. I did agree that any such tests required by law would be shared with the agency. I thanked her for coming by and sent her on her way. Never heard a peep from CPS again.

The visit was because one of our dogs made a mess while we were at work and someone thought it had been there for days. It hadn’t. Two words will explain it all. Custody dispute.


16 posted on 02/26/2024 12:49:15 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Fascism is already in effect in this once-great country. They use various excuses and fancy words, but it amounts to the government usurping total power over all aspects of life.

The mother/child bond is one thing that they HATE. They are doing all they can to destroy it.

Has nothing to do with a rash.


17 posted on 02/26/2024 12:50:04 PM PST by I want the USA back (Delusionary people should not be given power over normal people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

It’s all in Huxley’s “Brave New World”, to the letter......................


18 posted on 02/26/2024 12:52:44 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

They had no right to take that child. He was under medical care by the families doctor. An alternate antibiotic with fewer known side effects could have been prescribed. Of course the medical records are private but this is not a mother who neglects medical care for her son. No mention of a low grade consistent fever or any other abnormal vital signs. CPS was just showing their ass.


19 posted on 02/26/2024 12:53:28 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lastchance; DannyTN

Sorry M.S. brain today.

Should read family’s doctor. I do know this but M.S. gives me the galloping stupids sometimes.


20 posted on 02/26/2024 12:55:15 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson