Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Slammed for Wearing Army Uniform at Veterans Day Event despite Never Serving
SLAY News ^ | December 21, 2023 - 10:18 am | Frank Bergman

Posted on 12/21/2023 10:57:12 AM PST by Red Badger

A Democrat congressional candidate has provoked outrage for wearing a U.S. Army uniform while giving a speech during a Veterans Day event.

Newly emerged images show that Curtis Hertel wore an Army-issued physical fitness jacket during a Veterans Day event on November 11, 2023, in Lansing, Michigan.

Hertel, a Democrat former Michigan state senator who is now running for the House of Representatives in Michigan’s 7th Congressional District, has never served in the military.

A group of Michigan veterans is calling on Hertel to apologize for wearing part of a U.S. Army-issued uniform.

The group wrote a letter to Hertel which was signed by 28 veterans.

Hertel is expected to be the Democrat nominee for the state’s competitive 7th Congressional District.

The letter accuses the Democrat politician of giving the impression that he served in the military.

The veterans argue that Hertel committed an act of “stolen valor” by wearing the jacket.

The letter specifically focused on Hertel’s attendance at a Nov. 11 wreath-laying ceremony at the Michigan Veterans Memorial in Lansing.

During the event, photos show that he wore a now-retired U.S. Army-issued physical fitness jacket while speaking at the event despite not being listed in its programming.

“We, the undersigned veterans of U.S. military service, write to you today to express our deep concern over your conscious decision to wear an official U.S. Army-issued uniform while speaking at a Veterans Day event last month in Lansing, despite not having served in the Army or any other branch of the U.S. military,” the letter read.

“We respectfully request that you publicly apologize to all American veterans, in Michigan and elsewhere, and pledge not to repeat the offense,” it read.

“As you must be aware, wearing official military-issue attire, especially at a ceremony honoring those who have served, leaves the clear and unmistakable impression that you personally served in uniform.

“As a public servant who has frequently professed to support veterans and veterans’ issues, you must also know that this brand of ‘stolen valor’ is frowned upon,” it added.

The letter stated that Hertel never clarified to those in attendance that he never actually served in the military, and noted that although the jacket is a retired uniform and no longer in use by the Army, it “is intrinsically linked to the Global War on Terror era of military service,” and is a period Hertel was eligible to serve, based on his age, but did not.

“Additionally, because you were not issued the jacket by the Army, you must have obtained it from someone who was, which means you were aware of its status as an official uniform when you acquired it,” it added.

According to U.S. Army regulations, the physical fitness uniform is not considered appropriate for “social or official functions off the installation, such as memorial services, funerals, weddings, inaugurals, patriotic ceremonies, and similar functions.”

Additionally, retirees are authorized to wear the physical fitness uniform, but not as part of such a ceremony or gathering.

Hertel responded by claiming the jacket was a gift from his brother-in-law, who serves as a U.S. Army officer.

“My brother-in-law, an army major who is about to retire, gave me that jacket as a Christmas present,” he claimed in a statement.

“I wore it on Veterans Day to honor him and the other members of my family who served.”

Vietnam veteran Jack Devine, an organizer on veterans’ issues in the Lansing area and across Michigan who was also a speaker at the Veterans Day event attended by Hertel, defended the candidate in a statement.

“Curtis has always been a relentless advocate for veterans,” he said.

“It is ridiculous that he is getting attacked for supporting his family and other members of the military on Veterans Day.”

Additionally, Hertel’s campaign pointed to the now-retired jacket being available for purchase by the public, and touted his record on veterans’ issues as a state senator, including sponsoring a bill to create a new veterans’ cemetery, supporting legislation to make it easier for Michigan’s service members serving overseas to vote, and supporting a bill that made it easier for disabled veterans’ spouses to receive a property tax exemption.

The race for Michigan’s 7th Congressional District is expected to be one of the most closely watched in 2024.

Republicans are aiming to grow the party’s narrow majority in the House, and Democrats hope to flip the chamber.

The seat is currently held by Democrat Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), who is running for Senate to replace retiring Democrat Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI).

Hertel will likely face off in the general election with former Republican state Sen. Tom Barrett.

Barrett served in the U.S. Army for more than 20 years.

Barrett was the Republican nominee for the district in 2022 but lost to Slotkin 52%-46%.


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: cd7michingan; curtishertel; michigan7thcd; satanicmichigan; stolenhonor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Vermont Lt

I don’t know when “back then” was for you but “stolen valor” wasn’t probably much known or thought of. I think it has become an issue since the internet has enabled folks to claim it, politicians willing to lie about having served to get votes, or the idiots who are so self-centered that they need attention. The latter are, in what I’ve seen, created their outlandish dress uniforms that mix service insignia, etc, that an military ignorant populace doesn’t recognize as frauds. And who don’t know enough history to realize the Bravo Sierra they are being fed.


21 posted on 12/21/2023 1:45:13 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

Target, cease fire


22 posted on 12/21/2023 1:46:49 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

To me “stolen valor” is by folks pretending to have served in the military for their own gain in public...getting asked to speak at schools to tell about “their (non) service” or politicians, like many we have seen in the news the last few years.

Sounds like you had Army surplus that was just right for working on the farm, especially the boots and field jacket.


23 posted on 12/21/2023 1:50:46 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Back in the 70s, I used to buy surplus field jackets at Andy and Bax in SE Portland. You could get a jacket for maybe $15 and it would hold together for a couple of years, longer with a bit of sewing from time to time.

I don’t even visit Portland anymore, but I was a bit sad to learn that Andy and Bax recently closed after 78 years in business.


24 posted on 12/21/2023 2:08:54 PM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wearing it while hiking or at the mall as merely a stylish jacket wouldn’t mean anything, except for a politician it might be questionable, but choosing it to wear for a speech (and during the speech) at a veteran’s event deserves some looking into for motive.


25 posted on 12/21/2023 3:23:59 PM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“Additionally, because you were not issued the jacket by the Army, you must have obtained it from someone who was, which means you were aware of its status as an official uniform when you acquired it,” it added.

Not true. You can buy the jacket on the internet. A civilian could easily be ignorant of the fact that this is a uniform item.

26 posted on 12/21/2023 3:35:42 PM PST by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Much ado about nothing. I would like to have one.


27 posted on 12/21/2023 4:02:44 PM PST by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Technically, that is just Army apparel and not a uniform.


28 posted on 12/21/2023 4:23:35 PM PST by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

It’s quite clear what he was attempting to do. Disgusting!


29 posted on 12/21/2023 5:10:21 PM PST by V V Camp Enari 67-68 ( This clears up a lot of misconception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The letter accuses the Democrat politician of giving the impression that he served in the military.

This is one of those things that could be read either way.

On one hand not a uniform, on the other does give that vibe but still, not a uniform. Not right but not illegal.

So I would go for two days in the stocks. I got a bunch of tomatoes people could throw. They are canned but that is just a detail. :)

30 posted on 12/21/2023 5:18:25 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( In a quaint alleyway, they graciously signaled for a vehicle on the main road to lead the way. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson