Posted on 06/10/2023 12:28:25 PM PDT by george76
Rather than write 10,000 highly specific and legally granular words to deconstruct the Trump indictment, I will share the opinion of others with supporting analysis and add some substance to the issues. Later I will compile all the various points of analysis into one very granular article.
First, it is important to always remember why this indictment is taking place. The DOJ, specifically Lisa Monaco, are continuing the offensive against Trump in large part to cover for the actions of the Obama administration in the originating targeting of their political opposition. Originating Spygate operations (’15-’16), Russiagate (’16-’17), Mueller (’17-’19), Impeachment #1 (’19-’20), Durham (’19-’23) and Jack Smith ’22-present, are all part of one long continuum of weaponized DOJ and FBI operations. The entirety of the effort is to protect the actions taken by the Obama administration. [Note to congress: Questioning Durham this month is defense key #1]
In this interview {Direct Rumble Link} Jeff Clark gives his opinion of the statutory weaknesses that exist in the case as outlined in the indictment. The first two defense approaches will likely be: (1) the Presidential Records Act supersedes the issues of document holding as noted in the use of the Espionage Act. (2) However, if the Espionage Act [Statute 793(e)] has to be defended, the originating issue of “unauthorized possession” will be the second approach heading to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
...
Granular note, putting aside the fact that classification is irrelevant to the statute being used, within the indictment please notice how the DOJ states 102 classified documents [pg 27], some that were never marked classified as noted in the indictment [count 11, page 30] but defined as classified after DOJ review, were discovered after the Trump affirmation of compliance in July 2022. This is the predicate for the FBI raid. Again, a total of 102 documents were identified as classified by the FBI/DOJ.
...
They were unable to use classification status as a legal mechanism to attack President Trump; instead, they use the non-production as an evidence enhancement to the ridiculous claim that Trump lied to them (sec 1001); but notice how there are only 31 documents [31 counts] outlined as national defense security issues. This would mean approximately 70 classified documents are memory holed by this special counsel.
70 defined “classified” documents retrieved, no description provided, those documents not a part of any legal contention – they just disappear. I suspect we know what those sets of documents pertained to, and they have everything to do with DOJ and FBI conduct in Russiagate.
CTH has a years-long research library on all of these Trump-Russia investigative issues, including the in-real-time background stories that encompass them, and that library is massive.
If you have a specific question, ask me in the comments section and I will do my earnest best to review and answer.
Tell me what questions you have, and I will do my best.
Be of good cheer, I really don’t think this indictment will past the first defense challenge, The Presidential Records Act.
...
Seems oddly worded. I bet the concept here is pretty simple, but I don't really understand the words inside the brackets. "Defense key #1" is not a common phrase -- especially with Durham being a bit of a double agent.
So the DOJ took documents that weren’t initially marked as classified and *they* determined them to be classified, exceeding the power of the President to declassify whatever he chooses?
Where is that in the Constitution?
In the trash.
.
Positive Ping and an OK for another great:
Conservative Treehouse oped!
There’s a document listed in the indictment that had no classification. It’s peculiar.
Sadly, you are correct.
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Of course the Socialist Democrats realize how “payback” is going to work once the Oval Office changes hands again, as it always does.
The ground is now tilled and ready for EVERYTHING to result in impeachment, arrest, the works. Fishing without a license? Activate the grand jury!
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.