MUST SEE VIDEO: Election Hack Identified that Can Instantaneously Swap Votes on a Ballot Before It Is Even Stored

Gateway Pundit ^ | Published August 15, 2022 at 9:00am | By Jim Hoft

[RoseofTexas]

Richard Baris if you are reading this please tell us your take on the Wyoming Voting situation in tomorrow’s primary election? I heard there’s some really scummy stuff going on that might end up giving Cheney a victory by a hair. Heard mail in ballots have been cooked and that 11,000 democrats have switched to republican who have already voted for her via mail in ...What do you think? Please need input!

[Boomer]

TGP banned me for some reason they never said so they are in the doghouse forever with me.

Here's the .gif that's the heart of the matter.

[ptsal]

Bkmk

[Freee-dame]

Gateway Pundit’s articles are often very informative. Their headlines overstate ridiculously. They should make their headlines match their content. I wonder if they realize that many people won’t even look at their articles because of these headlines.

[EnderWiggin1970]

This is one area where a blockchain-based voting system would help. Blockchain technology is not a magic bullet to solve all election problems, but it does create a more robust system that prevents some categories of fraud, so used in conjunction with other tools it would provide safer elections.

In a blockchain system each voter could take a tear-off strip from their ballot, for example, with a unique identifier. After voting they'd be able to use the ID to look up their vote in the (ongoing or completed) election system to see that their vote was in fact registered and is being counted accurately for each contest. Since no one else would have the identifier it would be completely private, and the overall results on the blockchain would be transarently auditable, not just by formal auditors but by the general public.

[RoseofTexas]

THANK YOU MR BARIS! 🙂

[who knows what evil?]

Paper ballots, or quit bitchin’...

[DHerion]

All ballots should be stored and available for anyone to view...voters can have an identical copy of their ballot...then anyone can compare their copy with the original online by checking a number...

[airborne]

We might have to all write in Trump’s name just to prevent this next steal.

[liberalh8ter]

Would that render a ballot invalid? If it wouldn't, it would be a great “fix”, wouldn't it?

[RideForever]

Overlooked already. Analysis of log entries for ballot image hash# would likely show the duplicates, as one investigator found already. After an alteration the image is re-hashed and stored, and the number should be different than the first. And a log entry should note the change.

A sort of the ballot image data store by the hash# would make a reasonable gross audit check.

[JimRed]

I wonder if they realize that many people won’t even look at their articles because of these headlines.

If the headline includes "bombshell", "weird" or similar BS words I just don't look at it.

[bitt]

p

[Bob Ireland]

***The audit proved that the DOS is incapable of carrying out an election***

In PA I can believe it. The home of the Liberty Bell hasn't evidenced 'liberty' for a long time; for some reason many of the citizens don't want it. OTOH, the DOS is expert at carrying out a selection.

[Liz]

CODE CRACKED ON ELECTION THEFT (Hostage Vanity From Nick Moseder)
Nick Moseder on Rumble ^ | August 4, 2022 | Nick Mosedee via Hostage
Posted on 8/4/2022, 4:49:04 AM by Hostage

12 minute video:
https://rumble.com/v1eo1ec-huge-counterfeit-ballots-being-injected-nationwide.html

Nick’s video outlines the elements of the steal. Whoever masterminded this was clever and very smart, but not completely.

Long short:
1. A voter marks choices on a paper ballot, not knowing the ballot’s calibration marks are deliberately off.
2. (Some) The paper ballots are therefore defective, and when scanned are diverted to a folder of rejected image files.
3. Replacement ballots with proper calibration marks are printed to match the rejected ballots and are rescanned successfully.
4. The voter markings of rejected ballots are ‘partially’ copied over to the replacement ballots.

The above steps allow for a particular candidate’s votes to be altered while preserving down ballot totals.

Note in passing:
Nick mentions Heidar Garcia from Tarrant County, Texas. Garcia is elections administrator for Tarrant County. Garcia is a native Venezuelan who came from Panama where he worked 12 years for Smartmatic. Smartmatic is ultimately owned by Soros.

Thank you very much and God bless you.

-————_——————_—————————

This is posted for further development.

The content gets moderately technical for those that are trained, highly technical for the untrained. Can’t fix gap in understanding yet without schematics, cartoons, everyday analogies.

But expect Nick Moseder, in concert with former Law Professor David Clements and his wife Erin (Erin is an engineer and is off the scales sharp), will in days ahead, perfect the mass media presentation to inform all Americans who are living day to day in a concerned state about our compromised, subverted election systems.

I will leave here a personal knowledge nugget. Each pdf printed paper has ‘microcode’ printed with it that has information regarding printer, print time, location, and other details. It requires special equipment to read the microcode.

I assert a reason that access is blocked to paper and image ballots for audits is that the embedded microcode will not match with scanned information.