I don’t understand why anyone views this guy as being credible. He’s about as credible as Fauci, Walensky, and the “inventor of MRNA” who, despite allegedly inventing this stuff, knew nothing about it until after he had his full round of Covid shots.
His observations are reasonable given the side effects reported from early on. To say/suggest there’s no legitimate basis for his conclusions is to be dismissive of things we know to be true.
Fortunately for me, I get all of my medical advice from the Internet.
What could ppsobily gro rongh.
“IOW, he’s a lying hack.”
A very rich lying hack!
Never said he was giving a medical opinion. He is giving his own opinion. So, not a lying hack.
“Kirsch isn’t a medical doctor. He hasn’t examined Beeber, he doesn’t have access to his medical history or hereditary risk factors. Therefore, he can’t be “99% certain” about anything related to this specific instance. IOW, he’s a lying hack.”
Oh, come on. Since when do we need facts on FR? If anyone dies anywhere in the world, if anyone has any type of medical problem, it’s the ‘clot shot’, the ‘murder shot’. Freepers don’t need no stinkin’ medical degree to remotely diagnose a complete stranger.
“Kirsch isn’t a medical doctor. He hasn’t examined Beeber, he doesn’t have access to his medical history or hereditary risk factors. “
***
Good call. HOWEVER, he makes good points in his argument. When I simply fix my Jeep or my Corvette and do some mods or replacements, do I need to be a licensed mechanic?