Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left Strikes Again at Freedom of Speech in Akron, Ohio
The Daily Signal ^ | March 24, 2022 | Hans von Spakovsky

Posted on 03/26/2022 6:46:58 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Recently, the Akron Roundtable of Ohio invited me to give a presentation on the issue of election integrity as part of a recurring series it calls “Point/Counterpoint.”

As I told the audience, the sponsors of the Roundtable, which includes the Kiwanis Club, the Greater Akron Chamber, and the Akron Beacon Journal, were to be applauded for upholding the great American tradition of having civil, even vigorous discussions on important issues from individuals with differing points of view, a tradition that has virtually disappeared in our communities and college campuses.

The progressive, radical left, however, has no interest in upholding this tradition, protected by the First Amendment, which is vital to a functioning democracy.

I experienced a shameful example of this before arriving in Akron: the League of Women Voters lodged a protest with the Roundtable for allowing me to speak. The minions of the left want to silence anyone who disagrees with them or questions what they assert is the only acceptable “truth.”

The Akron Roundtable is one of the diminishing number of organizations that is still committed to open and civil discourse. As its website says, it is dedicated to promoting “community dialog and networking by presenting speakers who inform and educate listeners on diverse topics of importance to the region, the nation and the world.”

True to that mission, the organization has invited guests as disparate as Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio; Center for Immigration Studies Director Mark Krikorian; and Paul Helmke of the Brady Center. I was just the latest speaker to join this long list of more than 400 guests who have spoken to the Akron Roundtable, which is made up of a very diverse group of individuals, many of whom have different points of views on everything from politics to culture.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; akron; akronroundtable; cancelcult; censorship; civildiscussion; conservative; database; debate; democracy; dialogue; electionfraud; electionintegrity; elections; freedomofspeech; freespeech; hansvonspakovsky; heritagefoundation; leaugeofwomenvoters; liberals; markkrikorian; ohio; paulhelmke; radicals; sherrodbrown; speeches; theleft; votersuppression
It seems that the League of Women Voters wants to keep women voters ignorant.
1 posted on 03/26/2022 6:46:58 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They’re all for FOS... As long as the speech is something they approve of. It it isn’t then they want it hidden and censored. The left has always been all about that.


2 posted on 03/26/2022 6:56:16 PM PDT by Bullish (This is the most bloated and most inept govt in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
The significant freedom of speech decisions at the Supreme Court were all made when the left was at the pinnacle of their dominance of the media in the United States.

They were all for free speech when it grew their power.

3 posted on 03/26/2022 7:07:50 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I remember when the League of Women Voters was a truly non partisan organization.


4 posted on 03/26/2022 7:44:10 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
They were not trying to stifle FoS so much, but as to WHERE this speaking voice would be allowed to be heard.

The LoWV are against Freedom of Association.

5 posted on 03/27/2022 4:56:01 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
However...
 
 
 Nevertheless, the United States Supreme Court held in NAACP v. Alabama (1958) that freedom of association is an essential part of freedom of speech because, in many cases, people can engage in effective speech only when they join with others.[6] 
 
Other Supreme Court cases involving freedom of association issues include:[7]
 
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_association#United_States_Constitution
 
 
 
 

6 posted on 03/27/2022 5:00:05 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Hans von Spakovsky advoocates voter ID. Can’t allow such an offensive point of view.


7 posted on 03/27/2022 5:50:47 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson