Whatever Pfizer says, think the opposite.
Derp State Fact Check: All the way false.
The vax is safe and effective. Get your booster or the whole earth dies next week, including all the butterflies. Do it now.
Posted on 01/02/2022 9:31:33 PM PST by bitt
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Dr. Robert Malone says he was kicked off twitter for this 40-minute video presentation
https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
and PDF created by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which consists of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.
The video and PDF are a deep-dive into Pfizer’s own vaccine trial data which conclusively shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. For example, there were 20 total deaths in the vaccinated group versus 14 total deaths in the placebo group with nearly double the amount of cardiovascular deaths among the vaccinated.
Furthermore, Pfizer unblinded the trial participants, tested the Covid-19 vaccine on healthy and young individuals rather than the sick and elderly and did not track any subclinical biomarkers which would be valuable early warning signs of disease caused by the vaccines.
Pfizer reported a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that 95% actually refers to the Relative Risk Reduction, while the Absolute Risk Reduction was only 0.84%. Moreover, the Pfizer clinical results are unreliable because Pfizer introduced immense subjectivity into the trial by leaving it up to the discretion of investigators whether or not to test participants for covid-19. There were a total of 3,410 participants who had Covid-19 symptoms but were not tested for Covid-19.
Pfizer reported one of their 12-year-old trial participants who has been paralyzed to a wheelchair and forced to eat from a feeding tube for the last 10-months as “functional abdominal pain”. Another whistleblower who was a regional director of Pfizer’s clinical trials also reported to the FDA that Pfizer had falsified data, unblinded participants, and not followed up on testing participants who reported symptoms, but neither the FDA nor Pfizer ever investigated the issue.
Pfizer’s report authors had conflicts of interest with 84% of them either employed by Pfizer, owning Pfizer stock, receiving grants from Pfizer, hired as consultants by Pfizer, or previously running clinical trials for Pfizer. For example, two of the Pfizer report authors actually made $9B in stock market profit directly from the Pfizer vaccines because they also happened to be the co-founders of BioNTech.
...more
p
Bookmark
see the covid karens will say he’s not a credible doctor
yeah /sarc
about the covid karens, not Malone
I understand that there were two deaths reported as being due to CoVid in the unvaccinated group, vs one in the unvaccinated group - but still, 20 vs 14 should have raised alarms - and slammed on the brakes for the release of this so-called vaccine.
Bump
How come I’m always late getting on the cool ping lists?
Should have been “one in the vaccinated Group” (not one in the unvaccinated group).
Dr.Malone
Whatever Pfizer says, think the opposite.
Derp State Fact Check: All the way false.
The vax is safe and effective. Get your booster or the whole earth dies next week, including all the butterflies. Do it now.
I’m glad he’s doing this.
Shameful that so many died or were murdered because of the pervasive greed from the drug companies and those in government, when other options and treatment protocols were available and used with great success.
So my prediction, as with others, when this crap finally drops, ALL of it drops on President Trump. Perhaps an unintended consequence, perhaps not.
Absolutely read later.
Bookmark for later
There are so many things I want to post in regards to problems with this vid.
But I’ll start with RRR vs ARR.( relative risk
reduction vs absolute risk reduction)
For sure sample:
Breast cancer 1/8 women will develop currently
Say there is an drug or screening that reduces the incidence to 1/16
That is a 50% RRR
So 12.5 women get breast CA without intervention
Whereas 6.25’get breast CA witH intervention.
Significant, right?
ARR is the math of 12.5/100 vs 6.25/100 opposed to 12.5 v 6.25 (RRR)
RRR =50%
ARR =‘6.25%
So, what’s more significant to you, a RRR of 50% or an ARR of 6.25%?
Is. By doing X we can reduce your chances of breast CA by 50%
Or by doing X we cable reduce your chances of breast CA by 6.25%
Re-read and think it through:
I hate posting from phones
Sorry for the typos
The math and explanation is correct
bookmark for later ...
📌⬆
Thanks for that info. But in nearing 12 months on the ground, I have not seen this. We have the largest ER visit rate and ICU beds in our state, and for both Aug and and Sept, 97-98–% were unvaccinated. I don’t hav the last 2 months data completed, but it’s very close to the previous few months
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.