Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek

>> Same diff as between “who have eaten” and “who ate” - or as between “who have attempted” and “who attempted.”

And those are not two equal analogies — the first is structurally different, that latter is simply a substitution of terms.


15 posted on 10/18/2021 3:04:11 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric
>> Same diff as between “who have eaten” and “who ate” - or as between “who have attempted” and “who attempted.”

And those are not two equal analogies — the first is structurally different, that latter is simply a substitution of terms.

No, I'm sorry, but you are seriously mistaken.

"Who have died" is - grammatically speaking - IDENTICAL to "who have eaten." Merely the verb is a different one. But both sentences are in the Perfect Tense (or Aspect).

"Who died," "who ate," and "who attempted" all have essentially the same meaning as their Perfect Tense counterparts, but are in a different tense, namely: The Simple Past.

I have spent the past 35 years translating complex technical and legal texts from/into German, Russian, and English, i.e., my livelihood has depended upon my knowing the difference.

If you choose not to believe me, then I suggest that you consult, e.g., Wikipedia.

Regards,

19 posted on 10/18/2021 6:03:55 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson