Posted on 10/02/2021 8:11:21 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Yup! Liberals are in heavy hype mode for the "new" LUCRATIVE Merck Covid Pill. Remember, they are only concerned about you, The People... and their stock portfolios.
PING!
Merckvermectin!
IverMercktin.
Is that true? Have you seen the formula? What did Merck do to get a money-making patent? Do I sound skeptical? Damn right.
If it’s Ivermectin with a higher pricetag then that’s some serious bullshit. If it’s a new drug entirely, with no long term studies, etc.; then like the vaccine, I’m still not going to be in a rush to start taking it.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!
What is particularly disturbing is that it appears that molnupiravir contains some of the same molecular qualities as ivermectin, which makes you wonder if Merck knows that ivermectin is effective and just sought a more expensive drug that could be marketed as exclusive and new for COVID, thereby justifying another budget blowout by Washington policymakers.
And there you go...$$$. Thank you.
I believe you are correct.
However, I also believe they will add their ‘special sauce’. The powers that be have said they were going to come up with a ‘vaccine’ in pill form.
The CDC has a 501c3 Foundation since 1992 from which it accepts donations from the likes of George Soros, Bill Gates (largest donor), Pfizer, MERCK etc. Other pharmas too. They don’t even have to supply the entire list on their Foundation ‘partners’ page. So guess who gets lucrative deals through CDC?
Eugenecist Bill Gates controls our CDC, just as he basically owns the World Health Organization - they treat him like their god. Oh and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ‘partnered with’ the NIH long ago -they run programs together. And Gates hired Fauci in 2000 to produce drugs that Gates would force Africa to buy, using WHO (Africa’s primary source of medicines/medical services).
So MERCK is onboard with the weaponizing of ‘vaccines’. Merck’s Foundation is listed on the CDC’s ‘partner’s page under Foundations.
The Merck Company Foundation
Merck is a donor under 4 different titles (one may just be a similar name. on their corporations page.
Astra Merck, Inc.
Merck
Merck Partnership for Giving
Merck for Mothers
Merck is part of the weaponized CDC agenda.
https://www.cdcfoundation.org/partner-list
More ‘treatments’ like MERCK’S are heading our way.
Roche has one, and Roche has three CDC ‘partner’ listings under Corporation:
Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Roche Laboratories, Inc.
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Pfizer has it’s own new ‘treatment’ that’s being joked about as “Pfizermectin”. It has 3 listings on the CDC donors page under Foundations:
Pfizer Foundation
Pfizer Foundation United Way Campaign
Pfizer Inc.
Pfizer has a separate listing under Corporations on the donor pages.
Pfizer Inc.
This is an article talking about the upcoming drugs and impact on share value.
I was reading the 3rd category of CDC Foundation ‘partner’ which is Organizations. The NIH is listed there. I suppose the NIH could, in its benevolence, privatize tax dollars by using them to fund ‘positive programs’ by donating to the CDC’s foundation.
So many hospitals on that last list. Many hospitals and medical colleges and institutes under both Organization and Foundation donors. Our tax dollars were used to weaponize medicine against us. :(
(h/t ymani cricket)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3999784/posts?page=278#278
All You Need To Know About Merck’s Covid Pill Molnupiravir
October 2, 2021
Some highlights:
“Molnupiravir was developed for the treatment of Influenza. According to whistleblower complaint Molnupiravir has mutagenic properties and may change your DNA. Now, Molnupiravir has been repurposed for COVID-19. Merck has entered into agreements with Indian manufacturers and has also announced $5 million of donations to enter into Indian market. Here is all you need to know about Merck’s Covid pill Molnupiravir.”
Molnupiravir may change your DNA
“In April 2020, Rick Bright, who was removed as head of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) before the approval of the drug, submitted a whistleblower complaint asserting that Ridgeback pressured BARDA to provide funding to manufacture EIDD-2801 despite Bright’s concerns that similar drugs in its class have mutagenic properties.”
“A previous company, Pharmasset, that had investigated the Molnupiravir’s active ingredient had abandoned it over similar concerns.”
“In genetics, a mutagen is a physical or chemical agent that permanently changes genetic material, usually DNA, in an organism and thus increases the frequency of mutations above the natural background level.”
“exerts its antiviral action through introduction of copying errors during viral RNA replication.”
What could go wrong? scrambling your own code maybe? What would that look like? Rise of the Mutants.
Anyone notice the obsession with trying to alter DNA lately?
Follow the money -—> “In June 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services committed to buy US$1.2 billion worth of molnupiravir (approximately 1.7 million courses) from Merck if it received an emergency use authorization (EUA) or approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).”
yep higher price and less effective
brilliant!
A Possible Side Effect of Merck’s Oral COVID-19 Drug should alarm the Public
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/the-possible-side-effect-of-mercks
This was quite a bizarre assertion given that 59 studies, including 30 randomized controlled trials, have shown the drug to be extremely effective at all stages of the virus.
The statement regarding safety concerns was even more ludicrous given that nearly 4 billion doses of this drug have been dispensed for parasitic ailments, it won the Nobel prize, and it is listed among the WHO’s most essential drugs. There is no logical reason why someone would somehow begin experiencing dangerous side effects if he happens to use ivermectin for COVID instead of for scabies or river blindness.
Nonetheless, Merck’s statement served as a strong blow to the use of ivermectin, because Merck was a large dispenser of this drug. After all, why would the company dump on its own drug?
Well, now we have an answer. On June 9, Merck announced that it had entered into a procurement agreement. Merck will receive approximately $1.2 billion to supply approximately 1.7 million courses of molnupiravir to the United States government. Molnupiravir is a new drug Merck is currently evaluating in a Phase 3 clinical trials to serve as the wonder drug to treat COVID. The estimated cost of the drug per treatment is $700!
So now we can understand why the company would swap out its own drug that has already been proven safe and effective for something new and experimental. Without the government sending a penny to Merck, I can buy a lifesaving dose of ivermectin for just $26 through GoodRX.
This was quite a bizarre assertion given that 59 studies, including 30 randomized controlled trials, have shown the drug to be extremely effective at all stages of the virus.
The statement regarding safety concerns was even more ludicrous given that nearly 4 billion doses of this drug have been dispensed for parasitic ailments, it won the Nobel prize, and it is listed among the WHO’s most essential drugs. There is no logical reason why someone would somehow begin experiencing dangerous side effects if he happens to use ivermectin for COVID instead of for scabies or river blindness.
Nonetheless, Merck’s statement served as a strong blow to the use of ivermectin, because Merck was a large dispenser of this drug. After all, why would the company dump on its own drug?
Well, now we have an answer. On June 9, Merck announced that it had entered into a procurement agreement. Merck will receive approximately $1.2 billion to supply approximately 1.7 million courses of molnupiravir to the United States government. Molnupiravir is a new drug Merck is currently evaluating in a Phase 3 clinical trials to serve as the wonder drug to treat COVID. The estimated cost of the drug per treatment is $700!
So now we can understand why the company would swap out its own drug that has already been proven safe and effective for something new and experimental. Without the government sending a penny to Merck, I can buy a lifesaving dose of ivermectin for just $26 through GoodRX.
.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The results from the Phase III trial, which sent Merck shares up more than 9%, were so strong that the study is being stopped early at the recommendation of outside monitors."
stromectol is ivermectin
IIRC, it’s in the same class as Remdesivir.
No thanks.
I’ll opt for the horsey paste.
Wait a minute. If stromectol’s the active ingredient, how can it be in the same class as Remdesivir? The interaction of the drug combo...?
Here’s the BIG PROBLEM that the Left had. They knew the virus with treatable with HCQ/Ivermectin, but they had to keep the virus alive and killing people through the election. Then the vaccines were announced and they figured they’d kill off the virus with them...but the vaccines failed.
So back to treatments. They can’t simply admit that Ivermectin works, so even if not for the money, they needed a way out, so they wouldn’t look like the mass murderers they are (and have always been throughout history). So they come up with Ivermectin derivatives and that should finally put an end to the virus, once and for all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.