Posted on 11/17/2020 4:41:22 AM PST by EyesOfTX
Sidney Powell drops some bombshells on Lou Dobbs.:
Transcript:
POWELL: I’ve just got some stunning evidence from a witness, a high-ranking military officer who was present when Smart-Matic was designed. And I’m gonna just read you some of these statements, if you don’t mind, so I get them exactly right:
From the Affidavit: Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.
He made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for the specific voter, and that there would be no evidence to show, and nothing to contradict that the name and the fingerprint or thumbprint was going with a changed vote. SmartMatic agreed to create such a system and produced the software and the hardware that accomplished the result for President [Hugo] Chavez.
After the SmartMatic electoral system was put into place, he closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using the SmartMatic software. Once such election was in 2006, when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Rosales, a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez, vs. 3.7 million for Rosales.
In 2013, he witnessed another Venezuelan national election where the SmartMatic system was used to manipulate and change the results. In a control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results and voting, the actual voting results were fed into that room and onto the displays over an Internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by SmartMatic.
People in that room were able to see in real time whether the votes that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from any specific area or as a national total was going to be against either candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulating computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one candidate to another by using the SmartMatic software.
[End]
Now, that is indeed stunning if true. And if Sidney Powell is on TV reading it, I have no doubt at all that she believes it to be true.
But here’s the problem: It’s an affidavit signed by a witness whose identity we don’t know. If this is all Powell and the Trump team of lawyers have to present on the matter, it will not likely convince a judge or panel of judges to take any action at all.
Later in the interview, Powell goes onto allege that the same SmartMatic/Dominion system has been used to change the outcomes of elections all over the world, and alleges that the CIA would have to know about it if this was indeed happening. Unfortunately, when pressed on that allegation towards the CIA and its potential complicity, Powell only responds that “it’s simple logic.” Which is true, but which also is not going to convince any court in America to take any action absent some documentary evidence.
She and Dobbs both also point out the fact that former vice-admiral Peter Neffinger is the chairman of SmartMatic, and also now sits on the steering committee for the Biden/Harris Harris/Biden transition team. This is also very interesting and frankly shocking, but in and of itself will not be likely to convince a judge to do anything.
Next in the interview, Dobbs reveals that he has received news from an unidentified “source” who he describes as “highly reliable” that the FBI has a team “looking into” the conduct of this election. Yippee! Our dumpster fire FBI is “looking into” it! So, maybe 5-6 years from now we might see some kind of “report” on it all, but more likely it will come to nothing given that a real investigation would benefit the Bad Orange Man everyone in DC is trying to get rid of.
Again, all of this is very interesting, and I have little doubt that most, if not all of the allegations coming from the Trump team are true.
But – and there is always this “but” – they will be asking a series of judges, probably all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States – to take radical, unprecedented action to basically either reverse or disqualify the vote counting in several individual states. In all of their interviews over the past week, I have yet to hear Powell or Rudy Giuliani talk about having anything more than witness testimony in their possession.
These are all bombshells for sure, but if witness testimony is all they have, then their court cases are destined to fail. Obviously, no smart lawyer is ever going to reveal their whole case publicly before a trial, and all we can do is hope that Powell, Giuliani and their team have been holding some even bigger bombshells in their hip pockets.
That is all.
We need proof or this thing isn’t going anywhere.
No. That doesn’t matter. It only matters if you can prove, via the servers or intelligence software, that the votes were flipped.
Trump has to have a recount with signatures checked. That will demonstrate that the system is intact, or it is all voter fraud. The latter is better for our nation, but I fear it is not intact.
You’re right. I don’t mind donating more to Trump’s defense but they really need a smoking gun for what they are asking the SCOTUS to do.
I hope they find it in time.
Believe we have to wait until the paperwork is filed.
We need proof or this thing isn’t going anywhere.
And we need it quickly or it won't matter.
I caught about five minutes of Hannity on the radio yesterday. In that five minutes he mentioned twice that he did not know if there was fraud. Must have thought his Fox bosses were listening.
If it was done well, and so far it appears to have been done well, there will be no evidence that stands up in a court.
It would be nice if she dropped “bombshells” in court.
If memory serves, she isn’t very successful with that. Just ask Flynn—who is still a convicted felon.
Makes me think of the OJ coincidences. One coincidence can be written off.
With OJ?
The whole stack of improbabilities when multiplied out point to his absolute guilt.
Hannity is a company man. All $250 M of him.
the fraud is self-evident.
but the DeepState/FakeNewsMSM/Dems want the world to believe the oil & gas State of Pennsylvania chose Biden over Trump???
15 Nov: WSJ: Editorial: Why Democrats Nearly Lost the House
The problem is their policies, not their marketing.
Democrats nearly lost their majority in the House on Nov. 3, and their post-election recriminations show the reason. They think their problem was their packaging instead of their policies...
The result may be the smallest House majority since 1919, and it’s especially shocking as Democrats reclaimed the White House. Joe Biden leads Donald Trump in the national popular vote by about 3.6%, while House Democratic candidates are ahead by only 2.1% (a margin that exaggerates the Democratic edge because more Democratic seats were uncontested). Democrats also had an incumbency advantage with three times as many Republican House Members retiring this year than Democrats. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi blamed the losses on Mr. Trump’s ability to turn out Republicans, but the results show that Mr. Biden is more popular than are House Democrats.
Democrats are now brawling over the reason, with progressives and swing-state Members blaming each other...
Swing-state Members are more realistic in that they recognize the damage from GOP ads that attacked Democrats for socialism, defunding the police, raising taxes and eliminating oil and gas drilling...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-democrats-nearly-lost-the-house-11605482291
After his previous counsel participated in the railroad job against him.
Ima gonna explode if I read bombshell or bomb again. Conservative media has gone too tabloidy.
Well, it depends on SCOTUS.
I believe there is far more than a mere smoking gun here.
I am sure the Trump team has far more than they have revealed and Sydney Powell has stated as much.
THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MIND THAT THE DEMOCRATS CHEATED USING THAT SOFTWARE AND OTHER TECHNIQUES, THE MEDIA COLLABORATED AND TRUMP WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT UNLESS THEY HAVE CORRUPTED SCOTUS
It would be nice if she dropped “bombshells” in court.
If memory serves, she isn’t very successful with that. Just ask Flynn—who is still a convicted felon.
Powell was able to undo a lot of the damage inflicted on Flynn by his first round of RINO lawyers who told him to cop to lying and everything would go away. She brought a lot of the dirty deeds of the FBI into the daylight.
An affidavit is the written version of swearing under oath to tell the truth, just as if you were testifying in a courtroom. The document is signed both by the person making the statement, called an affiant, and by a person who is legally authorized to administer an oath, such as a notary public or certain court and government officers.
Signing an affidavit that contains false information can subject the affiant to criminal penalties. Therefore, before signing, it is very important to read the document carefully to ensure that the information is accurate and truthful. If the affidavit includes any statements that are the opinion or belief of the affiant, the fact that it is opinion or belief needs to be clearly stated.
Today is the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss the case in PA. We need to have a prayer group gathered together during the hearing praying for a just outcome.
If they are allowed to be rewarded for blatantly stealing this election, right before the eyes of the world in a Venezuelan type banana republican way, there will never be a fair election here in the future. You can kiss the Georgia runoffs goodbye. No freedom loving individual will ever be elected again. Time for mighty group prayer for this country.
but they really need a smoking gun for what they are asking the SCOTUS to do.
Out of curiosity what would this smoking gun look like?
The article misses the real issue. Witness testimony can do it, c depending on the value of the witness.
But the evidence has to prove THIS election result was changed.
So far, she only has evidence the software was used to change past foreign elections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.