Posted on 10/20/2020 10:21:28 AM PDT by grundle
Rudy Giuliani has named the person who showed him Hunter Biden’s laptop. His name is John Paul Mac Isaac.
By comparison, the New York Times never named the person who gave them Donald Trump’s tax returns.
Hunter Biden’s laptop became the legal property of the repair shop 90 days after he abandoned it. He ignored multiple requests from the store to pick it up.
Source: https://sonar21.com/yes-the-hunter-biden-emails-are-authentic/
By comparison, whoever leaked Trump’s tax returns committed a crime.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103
If the New York Times was only going to publish one of these two things, it should have been the info on Biden, not Trump, because the Biden info is the one that was legally given out.
Really? That requires ‘splainin’?
If you don't know who leaked the tax returns, then how do you know a crime was committed?
For all we know, Donald Trump himself could have leaked them. There's a good chance that's exactly what happened when MSNBC thought it had a huge bombshell story a while back.
Besides which the e-mails are “alleged” to be hunters. LOL! Schiff-4-brains says it’s just another example of Trump and Putin interfering in our elections by trying to schmeer the byeDUHn cartel.
I’ve said this before. Trump needs to jump on Biden over where he got the money to buy his mansions. If Trump’s finances are fair game, so are his finances.
If Trump leaked them, then the MSM would still be crowing about...
They could have been sent to the NYT with his permission.
Maybe his publicist “John Miller” leaked them to the NYT :)
Actually only one small part of Trump’s alleged tax return was released. That was the 1040 line number with federal income tax from the tax table. The 1040 line number with the amount of Alternative Minimum Tax was not released, and that would have been a very large amount. The 1040 line number with total taxes was not released either.
What is your basis for claiming a "good chance" that President Trump leaked his own tax returns?
This is what your theory that we don't "know a crime was committed" is based on.
Is "good chance" a preponderance of the evidence?
Is "good chance" a reasonable person's conclusion?
Is "good chance" beyond a reasonable doubt?
-PJ
The postmark on the envelope was from the U.S. post office right down the street from Trump Tower in NYC.
I dont think TRUMP HIMSELF has ever accused someone of committing a crime by leaking his tax records to the NYT or MSNBC.
Trump hasn’t filed suit against the Times for privacy issues and the Times hasn’t released any more stories lately about Trump’s taxes. That’s why I think it was Trump that may have leaked his own taxes to the times I think the Times suspects this but doesn’t want Trump to get the credit of having suckered them.
No one is talking about Trump’s taxes now because there is nothing there
-PJ
-PJ
If anything, his silence is really deafening.
If you don't know who leaked the tax returns, then how do you know a crime was committed?By comparison, whoever leaked Trumps tax returns committed a crime.
For all we know, Donald Trump himself could have leaked them. There's a good chance that's exactly what happened when MSNBC thought it had a huge bombshell story a while back.
Put the best face on it, and you dont know the tax return release was legal. The e-mail, OTOH, certainly are legal.
If I were to guess, my first thought would be someone in the IRS. But if what you say about the postmark is true, then my second guess is someone inside his office. That would mean that he'd stay quiet while his company's lawyers and security investigate the breach. Insider threats are the highest form of cybercrime, i.e., employees stealing company secrets.
-PJ
One intriguing theory I heard was that it was sent by one of Trumps ex-wives.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.