Good News: GOP to Challenge Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Voting Rulings in Supreme Court

Gateway Pundit ^ | 09/25/2020 | Jim Hoft

[SeekAndFind]

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled on several issues to ensure a Democrat Party win in November.
The rulings from last week include:

** The Green Party candidate was struck from the ballot
** Ballots will be accepted UP TO THREE DAYS after the election until November 9th
** Poll workers must serve voters in the county where they live — this protects far left districts where fraud is most likely to occur

If ballots are accepted until Friday November 6th it is clear now that Pennsylvania will not have their numbers in at least until November 9th, a Monday.
Democrats will do anything to win.

CLICK ABOVE ARTICLE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

The Hill reported:

Republicans plan to ask the Supreme Court to review a major Pennsylvania state court ruling that extended the due date for mail ballots in the key battleground state, teeing up the first test for the Supreme Court since the death of its liberal leader Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The GOP legal strategy, which was revealed in a pair of court documents filed overnight and Tuesday morning, has not been previously reported.

The development comes after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dealt Republicans a major blow last week in a bitterly partisan election lawsuit that could help determine whether President Trump or Democratic nominee Joe Biden takes the Keystone State, which Trump won in 2016 by just over 44,000 votes.

The expected petition to the Supreme Court comes just days after Ginsburg’s death from cancer last Friday injected further uncertainty into a chaotic 2020 presidential contest that is on track to be the most intensely litigated election cycle in U.S. history.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Does the party who files the request need to show first that he has already suffered harm?

That wouldn't be a problem. Trump ALREADY has suffered harm as per this report:

Ballots in Pennsylvania Were Found in the Trash. They Were All Votes for Trump.

[Political Junkie Too]

In the case of the legislature, the harm is the usurpation of their separation of powers by the judiciary.

Once the court overturns a power delegated solely to them by the Constitution, they've been harmed.

-PJ

[NEPA]

Previously SCOTUS has refused to hear PA appeals coming from Republican legislators.

The current Congressional district lines were drawn by the PA supreme court because the Ds didn't like the way Rs drew them.

Scotus refused to hear the case.

PA Supremes also ruled voter ID unconstitutional. I can't remember if that was appealed.

[be-baw]

Thanks. I didn’t realize that was in PA.

[tallyhoe]

How is that going to work with the court 4-4 jurist?

[Rockingham]

The harm is the change in the rules, so yes, there has been harm.

[dp0622]

I am not sharp when it comes to the courts.

So it would need to be in a federal court to reach the supreme court?

thanks for your patience with my lack of knowledge.

[be-baw]

I take it you’re not a lawyer.

[Rockingham]

I was, for quite a few years.

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

NC wants to count votes 14 days after election this BS is getting to be ridiculous they have early voting NOW they want voting extended 2 weeks AFTER election!!