Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California lawmakers OK lowering statutory rape reporting requirements
Press California ^ | 8/28/20 | Greg Burt

Posted on 08/28/2020 4:10:41 PM PDT by TedMartin

Sacramento, Calif. — The California State Senate approved a bill on Friday to lower the reporting requirements for some cases of statutory rape, authored by a Democratic Assemblywoman who was reprimanded for accusations of sexual harassment.

All ten Republicans voted no on AB 1145, which was sponsored by the LGBTQ advocacy group Equality California. It would change the reporting requirements for mandated reporters if the perpetrator is younger than 21, the minor victim is 16 or older, and the sexual activity is consensual.

Should it become law, high school teachers or counselors who know one of their 16-year-old students or counselees is having sex with a 20-year-old would no longer be required to report it to authorities.

The bill is especially concerning in light of how many LGBT organizations are sponsoring social events between young teenagers and young adults. See these fliers for examples of the wide disparity in ages promoted at such events.

In 2018, the bill’s author, Cristina Garcia (D – Downey), made headlines after being investigated for accusations of sexual harassment against male Capitol staffers.

“Despite the decision that the most egregious allegations could not be substantiated, it is clear that Assemblymember Garcia has engaged in a pattern of behavior that must be addressed,” Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon said at the time.

After a temporary absence from the Assembly, Garcia, an outspoken leader of the #MeToo movement, was required to attend sexual harassment and sensitivity training.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; california; law; metoo; perverts; predators; sacramento
Greg Burt is Director of Capitol Engagement of the California Family Council. He can be reach at gregb@californiafamily.org or (949) 244-2080.
1 posted on 08/28/2020 4:10:41 PM PDT by TedMartin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Epstein wing of the party. I’m starting to think wealthy elites who run the world are all just pedophiles. Gay or straight the just like having sex with very he very underage.


2 posted on 08/28/2020 4:18:00 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Of course they do. We can’t protect our kids from these predators any more. The govt is made up of perverts.


3 posted on 08/28/2020 4:18:59 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

And they (the queers) said they just wanted to be “recognized”


4 posted on 08/28/2020 4:22:57 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Honestly I’m surprised they didn’t make it 27 since democrats seem to think that’s when adulthood begins according to their healthcare mandate.


5 posted on 08/28/2020 4:49:12 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

Just another way to keep more black kids out of trouble, right?


6 posted on 08/28/2020 5:18:27 PM PDT by Bullish (CNN is what happens when 8th graders run a cable network.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin
In 2018, the bill’s author, Cristina Garcia (D – Downey), made headlines after being investigated for accusations of sexual harassment against male Capitol staffers.

Hubba hubba.


7 posted on 08/28/2020 5:27:12 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Right? With age groups mingling 4 years to 16 years old and 11 years to 25 years old , why not just push it to 27 years? /s


8 posted on 08/28/2020 6:32:56 PM PDT by just Grace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TedMartin

I see many shows on TV where the “perp” is some dumb 19 year old kid who gets a 16 or 17 year old girl pregnant, and is charged with statutory rape, placed on a predator list for life, etc. I guess what I’m saying is I’d be more inclined to support a law that allows those who are 16+ to be involved as long as there is less than three years difference in age. It seems pretty harsh to hang such charges on kids, who, might end up married, with him living in the home, and working a full time job. I say this, because my wife was 17 (4 months from being 18) and I was 19, when she got pregnant, and I was threatened by a prosecutor with statutory rape, decades ago. I simply waited til she turned 18, by which time I had a good job, and had saved enough to buy a house. I went to night college, while working, and continued climbing the ladder.

We got married, had several children, all of whom I’m proud are contributing members to society, and are raising great children on their own.


9 posted on 08/28/2020 10:42:31 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson