This has nothing to do with facts. It’s all about communism being shoved down our throats.
Everyone would really save a lot of time and money if the universities all closed.
The editors of Wikipedia could write every article that could be published by anyone everywhere to make sure the Party Line was obeyed to the most minute detail.
The advantage of this is that Wikipedia could be edited minute to minute to reflect the latest thinking of the glorious Party—and no academic need be confused by their previous errors.
Why would we want to risk human life by having independent thought?
The mob is so dangerous—and we would not want to upset them.
:-(
Misused? Allowing the public to know stuff that's NOT PC?
OMG - can't have that... /s
The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution
The truth was out there.
But not anymore.
Admission of grant fraud?
Heather MacDonald is the last person on earth to “misuse” anything.
She’s been arouund too long and done too much work to do that.
bkmk
“misuse” means spreading the truth to the masses...
Sounds like Winston Smith finally learning to accept and love Big Brother
Of course it was. We are heading into total racial Marxism and whites seem defenseless or willing to stop it.
Cherry picking I see...
This is an outrage and a rape of the scientific process. Publishing research contrary to the opinion/narrative of the Social Justice Mob can result in your dismissal and ruination of your career. Such research causes “Harm” and cannot be tolerated. At the very least the scientific community at Michigan State and elsewhere should protest the loss of scientific freedom and preferably should threaten to resign. Don’t hold your breath.
So, we cannot trust any of those “studies,” because studies that prove that the left is wrong get their authors fired and blackballed.
Scientists hiding the truth for fear of reprisals by politically motivated groups. So what is “settled science “? And we’re supposed to believe everything they say?
BLM has ALWAYS been founded on a LIE: That police shoot black people at disproportionately high rates because of discrimination. It’s simply not true. In fact, they are LESS likely to be killed by police.
And yet, the LIE has gone around the world, and people lose their jobs for saying the truth.
Cancel the liberal arts and humanities programs while you’re at it. If you can’t teach those subjects well, don’t offer them at all.
What is the truth? The truth is that which serves the revolution.
The universities in America are a disgrace. All funding needs to cease immediately.
A more recent study was done by a young black academic at Harvard. He studied the data himself and he studied many of the previous studies done before him. He found also that in the category of use of fatal force encounters between police and civilians (in that category alone) there was not a racial disparity in those encounters. He wrote about his study in a WSJ editorial.
“What the Data Say About Police
There are racial differences in use of nonlethal force, but not in officer-involved shootings.”
[By Roland G. Fryer Jr.
WSJ June 22, 2020 1:12 pm ET]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-the-data-say-about-police-11592845959
However, while Conservatives must appreciate Mr Fryer’s honesty in his study in the area of police shootings, Conservatives must also accept that Fryer’s study and the data do not exonerate all local police for the appearance of racial disparities in lower level police-civilian interactions. Yes, BLM’s claims about police shootings of blacks do not match the data, but below that level there are problems that need to be addressed.