Posted on 06/21/2020 6:50:04 PM PDT by bitt
There are many disturbing, deviant and remarkable aspects to the recent Netflix series Jeffrey Epstein – Filthy Rich but one of the most troubling ones – is how little effort journalists and the various strands of law enforcement are making to find Ghislaine Maxwell.
Even a cursory scratching at the surface of her persona and life leads to further questions. The end of any story-line or indeed investigation should come not when all the questions have been answered necessarily but when all the questions have been thoroughly asked.
A quick example. Ghislaine Maxwell has made three US political donations in her life. The amounts she donated are nominal enough figures and not that revelatory. The who is somewhat more interesting.
In 2007 she donated $2,300 to the Hilary Clinton Presidential campaign. This has been lightly reported, but I will say that it has been reported, once or twice before, in some mainstream publications.
But this is not the most compelling part of Ghislaine Maxwell’s political donations. The other 2 donations are far more interesting. The donations were to the same individual – one Gary King.
$ 4,000 in two separate contributions. Why did Gary King deserve $ 4,000 to Hilary’s $ 2,300?
Indeed, who is Gary King you might ask. I know I did. Well, first of all he was a Democrat. And in 2004, at the time of the donation, he was a congressional candidate for US House of Representatives.
Unfortunately for Mr King he was unsuccessful in his attempts to win election despite the support of one half of the most insidious pedophile couple in modern history.
However, a few years later this same Mr King had a little more success visit his life. He became the Attorney General for New Mexico. Yes, from 2007 to 2015 Mr King was the chief law enforcer in the entire State of New Mexico. A time when Jeffrey Epstein was doing god knows what to God knows who. Mr King certainly didn’t have any success applying New Mexico law to the evasive Mr Epstein.
New Mexico for those of you that are unaware, was home to one of Jeffrey Epstein’s multi-million dollar estates, Zorro Ranch in Stanley, and the location where a number of young girls in the documentary and beyond the documentary were abused.
Now, I am no Sherlock Holmes but If I was a Washington Post reporter with a nice fat expense account, I think I could knock quite a few questions out of an investigative trip to New Mexico. And quite a few stories getting to the bottom of this loose thread in the US life of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Jeffrey Epstein himself, as we all know, was also a frequent small donor to the Democratic party and on at least one occasion in 2000, a $25,000 donor to a Democratic Super Pac.
The interesting thing about making a contribution to a Super Pac is that the PAC files accounts. And all of the other contributors to that Super Pac are available to view. This particular one has the decidedly unglamorous name of the DSCC/NON-FED UNINCORP ASSOC.
The fundraising group was in existence for about 4 years until the end of 2002. As far as we can tell, Epstein only ever made the one, $ 25,000 contribution to the group. It is an interesting who’s who of Democratic patrons though. From Billionaire bankers, philanthropists and even a famous Hollywood movie star thrown in for good measure.
...more
p
Who is protecting her? Do we really even need to ask? The leftist deepstate has been protecting them all along.
Who indeed? Let me have one guess, just one.
More than likely another little black book
Like Hillary, she has the goods on a vast number of powerful people. And if she can guarantee that, in the event of an untimely demise, or any legal action, the information goes public, she will be protected by everyone.
Why is she not dead?
Did she make a copy of something that will be given to a media outlet or the authorities that would be compromising for many in powerful positions if she commits suicide?
epstein should have thought of that.
Epstein gets hit in a maximum security Federal prison. Why would s journalist go after folks that can do that?
Old PedoJoe is probably in her “little black book” so the whole communist party is probably protecting her.
She’s in a 55 gallon drum buried in a hazardous waste site.
These bi-monthly “leaks” serve to keep police forces looking in the wrong places.
The best journalists have always done that.
I don’t think you could find any organization to back such a venture. The media are owned by the same people that own the government.
That’s why it would have to be a journalist of the highest quality who is able to solve the Ghislaine Maxwell question.
Who’s not protecting her would be an easier question to ask........
I hate to say this, but I believe some really big money is involved in this scandal. That and powerful people.
You don’t say?
“More than likely another little black book”
Actually, they have videos. Many, many of them. Lots were kept in his safe, which somehow got emptied out right before the FIN raids.
If Maxwell doesn’t have them, she sure has copies. Lots of important people from all over the world, doing teenage girls. Think of the power and wealth that represents. Now think of the person who has them by their ballz.
Funny how the msm has no interest in this dynamite.
Maxwell is alive, and very, very safe. She ain’t dumb.
HUGH money and power.
I’d wager that most big publishing/media concerns have people that are up to their necks in it, and not by accident.
Odd how the Washington Post has no interest in democrat pedophiles...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.