REPOST: Trump is a smooth operator. He is challenging the Mayors and Governors acting on behalf of the DNC; by issuing this designation to one of the groups ALWAYS PRESENT when BLM types protest their way into rioting and looting, Trump is removing one group from the equation. Once this group of predominantly White troublemakers are gone, all that is left is the BLM and politicians predominantly Black from Police Chief to Mayor or DA to the Governor of each State.
Federal Law can be used for crossing State lines in the commission of a crime, e.g., to riot or loot, to harm people or property. Applying it only at this point publicly to the “predominantly” White Antifa it gives the DNC an out or way to save face while ending the riots. Should this fail Trump will enforce curfews using Active Duty Military taking it again out of the bag of tricks Democrats use to ensure stores and malls are closed without shoppers or employees to be hurt. There is a pattern in that most of the rioting is done after curfews are in effect.
Martial Law if used in certain cities or areas of a city again takes the legal option out of the bag of tricks Democrats use... e.g., by not enforcing laws or legal constraints upon “protesters”.
Trump will be able to show that Democrats are unable to protect and serve the public that votes them into office.
Does Trump really want to go there, and that answer is generally a No, however along the way if these actions are implemented it takes step by step control of the narrative from the politicians of the opposition DNC.
Might the Trump Administration review the official actions and communications of the public servants? Likewise, might the phone and email communications of people arrested come into play? Out of Stater’s Yes, local folk maybe depending upon the severity of the circumstance. Could the DOJ charge and try police chiefs/officers, mayors, DAs, city administrators, Governors and others who fail uphold their Oath of Office to protect the public?
Also a repost:
No matter how bad conditions get in “progressive” cities beset by riots, sending in the active duty military “to restore order” will only make matters worse, and shift the blame for everything that follows from the failed policies of their commie mayors onto President Trump. (I’m not counting the state national guard, reservist units which are called up by governors.)
Currently, looters and arsonists are released without bail by commie DAs. OTOH, active-duty soldiers, if sent in, will be charged to the max for every use of force by the same commie DAs. This is a lose-lose paradigm for the good guys.
So then what has to happen, when arsonists are released and soldiers arrested? The active-duty military will have to take over the civil governments of these failed cities, kicking out their commie mayors and DAs.
Then come the IEDs and sniper attacks. This escalation is SO PREDICTABLE I COULD SCREAM!!!!!!!
The British Army was sent to Northern Ireland as “peacekeepers.” How did that work out?
Ditto Marine “peacekeepers” in Beirut.
Or how about Iraq, after we demobilized the Iraqi army, and took responsibility for restoring civil order?
That was just great, wasn’t it?
There have been 100+ dynamite attacks in Pennsylvania in the past week. If the active-duty military is sent in, the dynamite will be turned into IEDs, and soldiers will face sniper attacks on every city street. And Trump will be blamed for every casualty on every side.
IT’S A TRAP! DON’T DO IT!