Also a repost:
No matter how bad conditions get in “progressive” cities beset by riots, sending in the active duty military “to restore order” will only make matters worse, and shift the blame for everything that follows from the failed policies of their commie mayors onto President Trump. (I’m not counting the state national guard, reservist units which are called up by governors.)
Currently, looters and arsonists are released without bail by commie DAs. OTOH, active-duty soldiers, if sent in, will be charged to the max for every use of force by the same commie DAs. This is a lose-lose paradigm for the good guys.
So then what has to happen, when arsonists are released and soldiers arrested? The active-duty military will have to take over the civil governments of these failed cities, kicking out their commie mayors and DAs.
Then come the IEDs and sniper attacks. This escalation is SO PREDICTABLE I COULD SCREAM!!!!!!!
The British Army was sent to Northern Ireland as “peacekeepers.” How did that work out?
Ditto Marine “peacekeepers” in Beirut.
Or how about Iraq, after we demobilized the Iraqi army, and took responsibility for restoring civil order?
That was just great, wasn’t it?
There have been 100+ dynamite attacks in Pennsylvania in the past week. If the active-duty military is sent in, the dynamite will be turned into IEDs, and soldiers will face sniper attacks on every city street. And Trump will be blamed for every casualty on every side.
IT’S A TRAP! DON’T DO IT!
When martial law is in effect understand that Military Law is suspends the local political order. Now reapply military law to your repost and see how the outcome really happens. It is very likely that arrests of politicians will be made for the reasons stated in my report:)