Posted on 05/02/2020 8:24:05 AM PDT by Ozguy1945
It wasn't necessary to get into a 19 year war to get bin Laden. (https://freedom-demokrasi-and-civilised-humanity.com/2020/05/02/the-death-of-bin-laden-chainsaw-massacre/)
Isn't the most important border for American troops to defend the one with Mexico?
Bin Laden was never the objective, as he was only a figurehead in a larger umbrella group.
Did they really get Bin Laden? It was the Obama administration after all.
“Bin Laden” is a metaphor for the enemy projected to the American people to make the case for an unnecessary war.
I’ve been arguing about Mexico being a failed state and that the ‘War on Drugs’ [sic] justifies a state of war existing between our two countries.
We should have bombed the Cartels to oblivion years ago. But that would have been bad for ‘business’, wouldn’t it?
Speaking of Mexico... we sent most of the US Army into that country in 1916 to kill or capture the chief terrorist of the day... Pancho Villa. The Army failed. If not for the approach of WW1, who knows how long that operation might have lasted?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.