He doesn't because the DNA study was botched, not least because there is no reason to believe she ever wore the shawl. The supposed DNA match turned out to be a typo, because the work was so incompetent.
May as well test DNA from all the supposed Ripper letters -- even the handwriting doesn't match, apparently they have about as many authors as there are letters, which is a little disquieting.
Last I knew, Scotland Yard wouldn't release the names of the various informants from the nearly 140 year old investigation, claiming it could endanger lives. That's good and nuts.
The results are more suggestive than conclusive and the original results were vastly oversold (as is always the case with any new Ripper theory) but after 130 years, it is doubtful that any smoking gun is going to emerge. This might be as close as we will get.