Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/10/2019 5:28:10 PM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: GuavaCheesePuff

Nope. Never said that. I dont base election decisions on race, color or gender bits.


2 posted on 09/10/2019 5:29:13 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Kamala should throw in the towel. She has no more chance then Mayor de Blasio.


3 posted on 09/10/2019 5:31:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
None of the current contestants that claim to be females are suitable. But, is that fair? To wanna be wymen? 😁. Oh, buttplug! DOH!
5 posted on 09/10/2019 5:33:16 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Someone like Golda Meir?? But then, I’m a bit biased.


6 posted on 09/10/2019 5:33:27 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Right now the person most likely to be the first female POTUS is Tulsi Gabbard.

In other words, it ain’t happening anytime soon.


7 posted on 09/10/2019 5:34:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator (... this has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Nope, nope....and more nope.


8 posted on 09/10/2019 5:36:04 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

At least I’m not voting for an ass-muncher like Buttpig.


9 posted on 09/10/2019 5:39:06 PM PDT by max americana (Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy it. I hope every lib die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Fake squaws, NO.

Genuine Alaskan beauty queens, YES.

ML/NJ


10 posted on 09/10/2019 5:41:30 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

...but not a Communist just because she wears panties and a bra.


11 posted on 09/10/2019 5:41:32 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

It’s not that they are women that’s the problem....it’s that they are the scum of the earth.


13 posted on 09/10/2019 5:43:24 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

I would never vote for a woman just BECAUSE it is a woman.


14 posted on 09/10/2019 5:47:00 PM PDT by Exit148 ( (Loose Change Club founder) Put yours aside for the next Freepathon!110)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
It is an interesting question: I believe on one hand that I would no hesitation in voting for woman candidate as long as she was a genuine conservative - but.

I have served under various women and they were less than satisfactory leaders.

Obviously some of the male leaders were unsatisfactory too, but the females had tendencies to over-discuss things (three hour meetings), had different perspectives than males, and often would ignore advice from subordinates.

In one case, I had a woman placed in charge of a project I had been the manager for a couple of years - because her agency had provided funding. She started out very nicely and respectfully and I opened all of my files and discussed every aspect of the project with her. Then she suddenly asserted complete control and told me that I was now a Technical Advisor and she would be Program Manager and she took complete control of design specifications, budget, timeline and testing - even though she had no background at all in the technologies or the operational employment of the system

She royally screwed things up and the project was almost cancelled until I finally persuaded my unit to resume control and to reject her agency's funding.

She underwent an almost instantaneous personality change when she went from learning about the project to taking control.

I honestly believe that men think very differently than women and it's not just "misogyny" - it's hormones and genetics and evolution.

15 posted on 09/10/2019 5:50:47 PM PDT by Chainmail (Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Not those women. There are women I’d vote for. They aren’t the ones.


16 posted on 09/10/2019 5:51:10 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

I have heard this and believe it to be true, that many black men will not vote for a women. They will stay home and hurt Democrats down ticket. The Democrats will need to cheat even more to win if Elizabeth Warren is nominated.


17 posted on 09/10/2019 6:09:43 PM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

If she is not a Margaret Thatcher clone, forget it.


18 posted on 09/10/2019 6:33:52 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
Amelia is fairly unattractive. 4.5 /10 maybe 5. Looks like she'd have a square build, too.

But let me guess, she would never have considered voting for Sarah Palin.

19 posted on 09/10/2019 6:48:49 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

We would vote for a woman. But we will not be screeched at for four years by the likes of Hillary or Fauxcahontas. .


20 posted on 09/10/2019 7:11:07 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Get your houses in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Not to be sexist, but not many women are good national leaders and it has nothing to do with their parts. The track record is sickening as we see Europe implode and America with the most asinine people to hold political office from the DNC. H.R. Clinton would have destroyed this nation.


21 posted on 09/10/2019 7:32:15 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

What does a woman’s butt have to do with it?


22 posted on 09/10/2019 7:36:54 PM PDT by real saxophonist (Yeah, well, y'know that's just like, uh... your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
they simply can’t imagine a woman winning against Trump.

I'm not familiar with "a woman." Who might she be?

23 posted on 09/10/2019 7:38:16 PM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson