Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America Embraces the Tyranny its Founders Fought to Reject
The Tenth Amendment Center ^ | January 8, 2016 | Mike Maharrey

Posted on 09/08/2019 10:29:23 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The American Founding generation fought a long, bloody war to free themselves from a tyrannical government, only to see the people eventually embrace the very system they struggled to throw off.

That may seem like a stinging indictment, but careful examination of U.S. governance today reveals that it rests on essentially the same philosophical foundation as the 18th century British system Americans rejected.

The founding generation developed a brand new conception of government, resting it on the consent of the governed and the idea that governing institutions must operate within constitutional constraints. Today, we still see the vestiges of those founding ideals in political rhetoric and popular conscience, but the U.S. government long ago threw off constitutional fetters and now functions much like the English system Americans fought to free themselves from.

In Rights of Man, Thomas Paine captured the essence of American constitutionalism that evolved during the Revolution, characterizing the Pennsylvania constitution as “a political bible.”

“Nothing was more common when any debate rose on the principles of a bill, or on the extent of any species of authority, then for members to take the printed Constitution out of their pocket, and read the chapter with which such matter in debate was connected.”


(Excerpt) Read more at tenthamendmentcenter.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Education; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: america; constitutions; government; laws; limitations; rights; tyranny; uk; usa

1 posted on 09/08/2019 10:29:23 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

An oldie but a goodie.

PING!


2 posted on 09/08/2019 10:30:07 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

These days people don’t actually want to read the whole thing and understand it; take it in and then apply it. Some will even go so far as to say “I have a job” - meaning “I don’t have time for that” or “I’m too busy”.

They want to quote it, and the use the quote to fit the topic around their own personal belief instead of molding themselves to fit around the Constitution and the Founding.

Quoting is killing us. It isn’t bringing us closer to the Founders, it’s taking us further away from them.


3 posted on 09/08/2019 10:59:08 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

America does not

Liberals do.

Americans do not


4 posted on 09/08/2019 10:59:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

America has not embraced it.

The Ministry of Propaganda wants you to believe America has embraced it.


5 posted on 09/08/2019 11:51:04 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

<>For all practical purposes, the federal government today operates without any limits at all. Everything the federal government does and approves is considered “constitutional.”<>

Thank the 17th Amendment.

But an Article V COS is too dangerous. Bullsh!t.


7 posted on 09/08/2019 12:10:23 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Bookmark


8 posted on 09/08/2019 12:29:33 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The Scottish Jurist and Historian Sir Alexander Fraser Tytler published a collection of lectures in 1801. He advanced a theory of democracy based on historical observation:

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can exist only until voters discover that they can vote themselves largesses from the public treasury. From that time on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.

"The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage."

Note the second word of the second paragraph. So glad the USA is a republic.

Source link.

9 posted on 09/08/2019 1:47:56 PM PDT by upchuck (If democrats would stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90% ~ h/t Mr K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Besides complaining about what has become a joke of an amendment nowadays, does the 10th amendment center actually do anything to support 10th amendment arguments in court for example?


10 posted on 09/08/2019 2:34:48 PM PDT by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ProgressingAmerica; BenLurkin; malach; upchuck
I’ll add this link to the article for another way we have moved away from the Constitution. Congress and Presidents have no problem writing and approving laws lacking specificity and leaving it to a bureaucracy to write rules which are indistinguishable from laws.

The History and Danger of Administrative Law https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/history-danger-administrative-law/

11 posted on 09/08/2019 4:11:49 PM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

bkmk


12 posted on 09/08/2019 4:42:51 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson