Again, Roberts too concerned about the reputation of "Roberts Court" (i.e., he wants to be woke.). Instead of what real Chief Justices do.
And Kavanagh is lining up right behind him (Levin was 100% correct on K).
The Bushes, the disappointment that keeps on giving.
Hunting trips to Texas.
We need to find out whatever they are using to blackmail Roberts and use it to make him retire.
if it were true that Roberts got two Irish kids through a South American human trafficking network, then that might explain his erratic behavior. But that would be a “conspiracy theory.”
Someone please send Sotomayor a box of jelly donuts. We need that seat. She will probably croak before Ginsberg, because Satan has a way of protecting his favorites.
If the Court acknowledges that what the President is doing is neither unconstitutional or illegal, then any other opinion or ruling they bring forth on the matter should be irrelevant. They’re a court of law. What’s the law?
Closet homo. Stole Irish kids. Multimillionaire, Harvard, Ran away to Malta to hide after the stab in the back on Obamacare.
We will be stuck with this new world order Bushie for decades.
The FANTASY that the SCOTUS is “Conservative” continues...
The Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA)
The most important project of Fedzilla for the past 30 years.
Replacing the electorate.
Didn’t get married till he was 41. No women accused him of busting a move on them. Ivy League.
I know what that means.
Roberts got it right.
Settled precedent not disputed by the executive branch states that ‘in order to permit meaningful judicial review, an agency must “disclose the basis” of its action. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U. S. 156, 167 169 (1962); see also SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U. S. 80, 94 (1943) (“[T]he orderly functioning of the process of review requires that the grounds upon which the administrative agency acted be clearly disclosed and adequately sustained.”).’
Ross state that the reason for the question was a DOJ request, but the record shows that he engineered that request. The closest Justice Thomas’ dissent got to addressing that point was an irrelevance about “the DOJ’s multilayer review process and its explanation for requesting citizenship data.”