Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

If the Court acknowledges that what the President is doing is neither unconstitutional or illegal, then any other opinion or ruling they bring forth on the matter should be irrelevant. They’re a court of law. What’s the law?


8 posted on 06/28/2019 9:25:15 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingcrazy

“If the Court acknowledges that what the President is doing is neither unconstitutional or illegal, then any other opinion or ruling they bring forth on the matter should be irrelevant. They’re a court of law. What’s the law?”

Perfectly stated. They are morphing into a “court of motives”. Remember during the travel ban, they were giving clips of Trump in the campaign more weight than the actual legal reasoning.

Rule of law is over, and we are no longer in a constitutional republic. At this point it is a tyrannical oligarchy, and everything has to be stated in the format of the constitution using sophistry.


15 posted on 06/28/2019 9:34:41 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rightwingcrazy
They’re a court of law. What’s the law?

For what it's worth it's the Administrative Procedures Act and it says that even if an agency has the right to make a decision that decision can't be arbitrary and capricious.

Wilbur Ross botched the whole thing but he's being given a do-over.

19 posted on 06/28/2019 9:59:11 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson