Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twitter: Excelling @Censorship
Family Research Council ^ | May 9, 2019 | Tony Perkins and FRC senior writers

Posted on 05/09/2019 7:28:04 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

When the head of Twitter's public policy department told the Senate he'd do more on conservative censorship, making it worse wasn't what most leaders had in mind! Unfortunately, that's exactly what seems to be happening -- to pro-lifers, Trump supporters, and even popular parody accounts. Three weeks ago, Carlos Monje Jr. was apologetic for the mistakes Twitter had made. A month later, he has a lot more to be sorry for.

Their stories are different, but several victims of Twitter's bias have one thing in common: no one explained why. Mike Morrisson, who's been running a popular "AOC Press" account as a joke, said he was banished from the platform on Monday night. "I still don't really know why," he wrote in Human Events. "I have my suspicions, but no one's really tried to explain it to me." His parody of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) had over 80,000 followers. "It was pretty funny, even if I do say so myself." Apparently, Twitter wasn't laughing -- which is more than a little hypocritical, since social media has made mocking the president a cottage industry.

But there are some dark implications of this conservative blackout, Morrisson warns. "This is a nation which reveres, at its core, the rights of individuals to express themselves politically, lawfully." The fact is, he goes on, "as we move closer to the 2020 election, a number of high-profile, high follower, conservative accounts are being banned. In total, we have lost access to millions, maybe even tens of millions of impressions over the past few days. This is election interference."

(Excerpt) Read more at frc.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: censorship; conservatives; election2020; interference; purge; socialmedia; techtyranny; twitter
Tech tyranny.
1 posted on 05/09/2019 7:28:04 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

PING!


2 posted on 05/09/2019 7:29:02 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Who’s going to do anything about, congress? No, they are too busy trying to entrap Trump Jr.


3 posted on 05/09/2019 7:32:37 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

4 posted on 05/09/2019 7:35:50 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It isn’t just “Conservative” accounts being banned. Any sites posting on non interventionism or posting vid’s of atrocities by US allies is getting banned, shadow banned, search banned, suspended.


5 posted on 05/09/2019 7:58:02 PM PDT by sockmonkey (I am an America First, not Israel First FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Should FR be forced by government bureaucrats to allow leftists to post here?

What about forcing Rush Limbaugh to allow equal time to leftists hosts and guests?

Fight Twitter in the marketplace. If enough conservatives leave, Twitter would go belly-up. Because reading Tweets by liberals screeching against Trump doesn't pay Twitter bills.

And please, don't give me this crap about "MUH, WHAT IF ATT DISCRIMINATED AGAINST CONSERVATIVES WITH THE TELEPHONE??" Totally different argument. Not the same.

6 posted on 05/09/2019 8:25:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Isn't it funny that the very people who scream "My body, my choice" wants a say in your healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Apples and Oranges. Facebook and Twitter were funded by US Government money. Twitter and Facebook get government IT work. Twitter and FB have legal protection from content based lawsuits because they are supposed to be neutral channels. They should be liable for content based lawsuits as editors and publishers.

Ask a university how long they can take federal money and still flip the finger to a raft of EEOC laws. Ask any contractor from Lockheed-Martin on down whether or not that work comes with a metric F-ton of rules, regulations and EEOC.

FR on the other hand gets no federal money. FR can be sued over content in some circumstances. FR avoids certain publishers for that reason.

FR is nothing like Facebook or twitter legally speaking. Eat the cracker jacks...throw the law degree prize inside aay.


7 posted on 05/09/2019 10:23:50 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“”MUH, WHAT IF ATT DISCRIMINATED AGAINST CONSERVATIVES WITH THE TELEPHONE??””

Sorry sport. It IS the same. ATT and Verizon are common carriers and do not exercise content control. They interfere with nobody. And because of that status, nobody can sue ATT or Verizon because of what happens on their network.

Facebook has the same legal protection from litigation that ATT does, but they also exercise editorial and publisher control. Hell, they are now literally creating content.

If they want to be private and discriminate, they should lose all legal protection and government contracts for any IT services whatsoever. And even that probably isn’t enough. Facebook was created with CIA venture capital. It is a government operation. Facebook can no longer hide behind “private company” because they coordinate strategy with the government and do things the government cannot. But in coordination... that is called “fascism”.
FB does the suppression and censorship of ideas that the government wants, and Govt rewards FB with legal protection and contracts. A public private partnership.

Just as Mussolini envisioned.


8 posted on 05/09/2019 10:35:32 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

What do you propose to do?


9 posted on 05/10/2019 4:16:53 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP
What do you propose to do?

Treat them like the public utility they are. Remember, they took Trump to court to force him to allow anyone to post public replies on Trump's twitter feed, even they guy who floods all his posts with extremely disgusting stuff. Said it was free speech issue. Well, conservatives have free speech too.
10 posted on 05/10/2019 4:24:35 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

OK, that’s a start.


11 posted on 05/10/2019 4:26:33 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson