Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: WHY Would Trump 'Obstruct' Mueller, who was proving no crimes happened?
Self ^ | 4/22/2019 | Mr. K The Know-it-all

Posted on 04/22/2019 9:31:20 AM PDT by Mr. K

I keep hearing people ask HOW could Trump 'obstruct justice' for nothing- no crimes were committed that needed 'justice'

But the better question is WHY?

Why would he obstruct Mueller who was apparently busy finding him innocent?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: obstruction; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Why stop a man who is proving you right?
1 posted on 04/22/2019 9:31:20 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The problem with the whole obstruction thing is it is very much about intent.

An example:

If you ARE guilty of what they were accusing Trump of, and then you fire Comey, you can be accused of abstruction of justice because your “motive” was to keep him from revealing the truth.

However, if you are completely innocent, and you fire Comey, your motive was not to keep from getting caught. So it’s not obstruction.

And, frankly, the way this is playing out, the left is attempting to turn anything trump did into obstruction, which is virtually impossible since no crime was committed. That is, there was no motivation to obstruct justice. The motivation was to end an investigation into a crime that didn’t happen. Further, he only attempted to do that. And since it wasn’t obstruction, it wasn’t even attempted obstruction.

It’s a huge nothingburger. The only fuel the left and MSM can glean from this report is that Trump seemed to tell people to not testify to things. And since there was no crime to hide, is motives were not to obstruct justice.


2 posted on 04/22/2019 9:38:14 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Bingo. To contend that Trump was obstructing Mueller to thwart him from discovering that there was no collusion is ludicrous. But it's the best the MSM has as individuals attempt to dodge sedition charges.


3 posted on 04/22/2019 9:40:13 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Because he didn’t know.

And he was obviously nervous enough about his own conduct - not knowing whether it would be against the law or not, or held against him or not, or spun to be something it wasn’t.

I think at one point he came very close to dismissing Mueller and it was a good thing that he didn’t because that would have made it look worse.


4 posted on 04/22/2019 9:41:22 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

No, he knew he did not collude...

So he knew nothing would be found.

And the record now proves he used no executive privilege and gave extraordinary cooperation to Mueller.


5 posted on 04/22/2019 9:43:54 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Because, even if you are innocent, people who are trying to take you down may come up with some plausible seeming “evidence”. Being innocent is no guarantee that you will not be convicted.


6 posted on 04/22/2019 9:45:05 AM PDT by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Right.

I was referring to the obstruction piece of it. Some counsel somewhere may have told him that his discussions with Comey, McGhan, Cohen and even Sessions could be construed poorly or were even borderline.

I think he was a little nervous


7 posted on 04/22/2019 9:48:47 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

I doubt that- Rosenstein recommended he fire Comey- then hired a special prosecutor for firing Comey.

I hope that P.O.S. gets what is coming to him...


8 posted on 04/22/2019 9:54:18 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Simply, Trump did not know Mueller was going to clear him (mostly) so he may have wanted to end an investigation he knew could go anywhere and could “indict a ham sandwich”. I don’t blame him for at least discussing all possibilities.

Rush is musing now that, with an army of Clinton lawyers on the team, how did they agree to *not* hold anything against Trump that was actionable? He believes some (including Mueller) probably would not agree to an official indictment with their signatures that wasn’t proven and the end result was a compromise to get the final report completed.


9 posted on 04/22/2019 9:56:24 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Don’t even bother taking the bait.

The Rats are just trying to create a buzz about nothing.

The collusion illusion was a hoax and so is this.

There’s no point in even discussing it - you’re just getting sucked into their trap.


10 posted on 04/22/2019 10:02:24 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I believe you can still be guilty of obstruction if you actively impede an investigation, regardless of its outcome.

That said, that the investigation resulted in no originating crimes being declared leaves the question of the validity and legality of the investigation in the first place. What was the probable cause? Isn’t this a “poisoned tree”? Why shouldn’t all of the indictments & convictions be thrown out? Lives were destroyed.

Mueller knew from the outset that there was no “Trump-Russia” activities, there was no evidence - so what about all the raids? Roger Stone was raided just weeks ago.

It all makes no sense UNLESS...the goal was ALWAYS to get PDJT on some form of “obstruction”. The investigation was just the vehicle to setup the right situation. Look at what they did, raiding his LAWYER - it was all to bait PDJT into some action that could be specifically pointed to. Their problem is that he didn’t do anything of significance that rises to the level of obstruction - this is what is driving them nuts. This is why the media is trying really hard to distort the “evidence” to reach the bar needed to claim impeachment justification, even to the point of just talking like it’s a no-brainer it does.

If they found some real crimes that would have just been a bonus, they probably thought they would find something - but if not the fallback was always obstruction.

...outside that, that the Mueller team was made up of purely Democrats, it might also have been to cover up the crimes of Hillary and Obama.


11 posted on 04/22/2019 10:02:44 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

OBSTRUCTION OF INJUSTICE!


12 posted on 04/22/2019 10:08:13 AM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

How would he know what Mueller was doing?
Volume 2 is proof Muller was hunting for a pony he could ride, and not investigating.
Making it easy for an “investigator” who has clearly already made his mind up ... is just stupid. Especially after the hounding of Hatfill in the anthrax case. It’s not obstruction to demand the investigators play by the rules.


13 posted on 04/22/2019 10:16:29 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

The real obstruction of justice was in diverting DOJ resources and personnel from their duties to instead serve the political agenda of the Democratic Party.


14 posted on 04/22/2019 10:22:05 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

DING~! DING~! DING~!

WINNER!


15 posted on 04/22/2019 10:39:10 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

And another question, if Trump has the power to fire Mueller, or to direct his investigation to be shut down, if Trump has the power to direct an investigation to be started or stopped, OR to even conduct it personally... If he has the power to negate any prosecution Muller did with pardon power...then exactly how the hell can he “obstruct” him?

It’s retarded. You cannot prosecute a president for obstructing one of his minor bureaus or Cabinet level departments.

If a President acts in a corrupt manner there is one and only one remedy. Congress can impeach him.


16 posted on 04/22/2019 10:45:22 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

A president cannot “obstruct” his own branch of government. See post #16


17 posted on 04/22/2019 10:46:55 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: piasa

there is no doubt Trump was mad-:

FAKED collusion documents
The SITTING president being secretly recorded -BY Comey!
FBI and CIA resources discussing how to get rid of a SITTING president!@#$- WTF!

Trying to Entrap members of Trump’s family!

How about Trump just firing EVERYONE - and do a lottery
to fill positions in his administration-

This is what the ldemonrats are left with : Trump
complaining about what the CIA FBI can even investigate.

Did I say complaining?? must be obstruction

laughable but with the dims and never Trumpers in abundance— pray that Trump/Pence can defeat this evil.


18 posted on 04/22/2019 10:48:15 AM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

In America’s corrupt, politicized Federal justice system, we all know a prosecutor can indict a ham-sandwich.


19 posted on 04/22/2019 10:59:24 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

That’s what a Special Counsel is for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_prosecutor


20 posted on 04/22/2019 11:02:56 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson