Posted on 04/01/2019 4:45:06 PM PDT by Thalean
UBI is like putting a Band-Aid around Americas ruptured aortait might help, but it wont stop our economy from flat-lining.
Heres why:
Andrew Yang thinks automation will result in mass unemployment, and therefore we need a UBI to soften the blow. Both the economic logic and evidence suggests otherwise.
Begin with this logic: Employment is determined by the ratio between productivity and output. All other things being equal, higher productivity (getting more done each hour) means fewer jobs, while higher output (making more stuff) means more jobs. If both productivity and output increase at the same rate, then employment does not change. This remains true no matter how fast productivity increasesno matter how many robots we build.
Consider that between 1950 and 1979 Americas manufacturing productivity increased by over 3 percent per year, and yet employment increased. Why? Because output grew even faster.
By the 1990s, things had changed. Between 1989 and 2000 American manufacturing output grew by 3.7 percent on average, while productivity grew by 4.1 percent. Guess what? Employment declined. Since 2000, output growth nosedived: output grew only 0.4 percent per year, on average, while productivity increased at a rate of 3.7 percent.
As a result, America lost more than 4 million manufacturing jobs.
What did the media blame for Americas job loss? Automation. Yet the historical data refutes this claim unambiguously: automation does not cause job loss unless output growth lags behind. So the real question is: what is causing output growth to decline?
Answer: the trade deficit.
The fact is that much of Americas new output growth is occurring abroad, as opposed to domestically. Rather than build a new factory in Michigan, we build it in Mexico. Rather than open a call center in Philadelphia, we set it up in the Philippines. We consume more and more goods and services, but do not make them ourselves. As a result, output stops growing, but productivity does not. This gives the false illusion that, by increasing productivity, automation is causing job lossbut this is only the proximate cause.
The real culprit is, and has always been, offshoring.
How about...NO.
We already have UBI, it’s just in the form of food, phones, housing, internet, medical, etc. Giving assistance in the form of cash would just increase the corruption level.
“If both productivity and output increase at the same rate, then employment does not change. “
If the productivity is gained by replacing the workers with robots then — yes — exployment certainly does change.
Good visual.
The USA is basically a soft Socialist nation unfortunately. Anymore will destroy the nation as we know it.
I thought the current debt was 21.1 trillion
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.