Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/16/2018 7:46:37 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DIRTYSECRET

If that’s the answer, I’m not sure I want to know what the question was..


2 posted on 04/16/2018 7:47:43 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~u/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET
My idea was to award every newborn with a $1k deposit in the S & P 500-no withdrawals until age 59.

You want me to contribute to giving someone else's kid a kilobuck?

Why don't their parents do that instead?

3 posted on 04/16/2018 7:49:16 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

$1K or $5K to have a baby? Let’s see, that should cover the first few months of having a baby. Then you’re out of pocket. .


4 posted on 04/16/2018 7:50:13 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

You do know this is a conservative forum, right?

The Bernie Sanders symposium is 3 doors down on the left..


5 posted on 04/16/2018 7:50:45 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Just tack the cost to the hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt you’ve saddled them with. Brilliant!


6 posted on 04/16/2018 7:53:10 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

That idea is not new. And just imagine, with about 4 million babies born each year it would only cost $4 billion a year, a pittance compared to the current Federal budget of $4 trillion.

Still, the entire notion is extremely socialist. That’s why I’m opposed.

Parents could do it. There could be a tax incentive to do it. But free money, just because you were born? Never.


7 posted on 04/16/2018 8:02:02 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Seems like “free money at birth” (on top of whatever free money is already available to many) would just encourage more “anchor babies”, or those who tend to have children for the purpose of milking the freebies in the system.


8 posted on 04/16/2018 8:05:19 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

This wold ultimately morph into a mechanism for financing the federal debt.


10 posted on 04/16/2018 8:10:18 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET


"And our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there's no war or famine, oppression or brutality - one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock - all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused."
14 posted on 04/16/2018 8:14:26 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

The problem is that 1K deposited now, will still be worth about $1K in 50 years.

unless you were really lucky and put it into stocks and bonds that beat the annual inflation rate, AND made a lot of money.

Like all the politicians seem to be able to do.


16 posted on 04/16/2018 8:16:46 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

So the long-suffering American taxpayer shells out for those who don’t need it? The feds are supposed to dictate now what is invested for whom where?

I see this as an all-around horrible idea.


21 posted on 04/16/2018 8:40:14 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

All that would do is apply a bias that would negate the money.


22 posted on 04/16/2018 8:44:26 AM PDT by CodeToad (The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republiverycans took their slaves away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

How about the kids’ parents do the “awarding”?????


31 posted on 04/16/2018 9:13:28 AM PDT by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Why is “college” the only worthy - eligible - investment for which a young person would be able to draw on these special savings accounts? The overwhelmingly popular idea that such massive “rewards” to 18-25 year olds belong primarily for bailing out the education industrial complex is one of the main errors of this society.

But I skipped the main ingredient. The main ideas are wrong to being with. Get the government - taxes - more and more off of everyone’s back, and quit using government to bail out extravagant costing industries - education & health care - and you’ll get more money left in everyone’s pocket and more decisions based on natural market choices instead of pie-in-the-sky utopian “government can solve this” “solutions”.


38 posted on 04/16/2018 1:40:53 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Issue “Border Wall Bonds.” I’d buy some of those.


39 posted on 04/16/2018 2:04:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson