Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

That idea is not new. And just imagine, with about 4 million babies born each year it would only cost $4 billion a year, a pittance compared to the current Federal budget of $4 trillion.

Still, the entire notion is extremely socialist. That’s why I’m opposed.

Parents could do it. There could be a tax incentive to do it. But free money, just because you were born? Never.


7 posted on 04/16/2018 8:02:02 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tom h
And just imagine, with about 4 million babies born each year it would only cost $4 billion a year...

Plus another 20 billion to cover administration, kickbacks, and the building of a website by one of Michelle Obama's college friends. :)

13 posted on 04/16/2018 8:12:34 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

Why even a tax credit?

We already have bad legislation from Ivanka in the tax cut package: subsidizing child care for Jivanka’s rich friends on the Upper East Side with scads of nannies—but it distorts the market all the way down: 1) making it harder for mothers to simply stay home with the kiddos, and 2) removing both fairness and incentive from the system by favoring parents over simply using low marginal rates to encourage the economy in general.

We don’t need more bad policy!


23 posted on 04/16/2018 8:46:18 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson