Posted on 09/20/2017 9:00:17 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
The following article was originally posted on The Coach's Team on April 12th, 2016. The author was a pretty sharp cookie!
The “experts” are using “reliable” polls to say Hillary Clinton would bury Donald Trump in a general election.
The “experts” are conveniently disregarding the dynamic scoring factor for obvious reasons.
We usually only see dynamic scoring in the disastrous results of Democrat legislatures raising taxes without regard for what social dynamic factors will do to their “projected” revenue yields.
As this faulty logic goes; if they get $100.00 in tax money from the sale of an item, it stands to reason that by doubling the tax to $200.00 the government will now receive twice as much tax income.
What often happens, however, is this double tax leads people to change their spending habits to avoid paying the increased levy.
As a result, the yield often falls short of even the original level.
Politicians and the pollsters they buy never factor in dynamic scoring because it doesn’t fit the outcome they want.
In the case of taxation it is usually foreseeable; in the case of polling for an election seven months from now dynamic scoring is always a prime factor and very predictable.
In a general election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton dynamic scoring is almost 100 percent of the ingredients that will determine the winner. They are equal in name recognition and funding so where is the dynamic scoring factor?
Clinton is a walking, target rich environment who has not had anyone press her and make her criminal record stick; and she has huge unfavorable ratings with virtually all groups, even with women who are supposed to be her main strength. Dynamic scoring will show up in Clinton’s actions and in-actions at Benghazi where four Americans died. It is found in her shameful attacks against the women her husband raped over the years.
Dynamic scoring will rip Hillary Clinton to pieces once Trump sinks his teeth into her. Making believe that these things won’t affect the election is as disingenuous as telling people that doubling taxes will double revenues.
There is a final bit of dynamic scoring that the “experts” are not considering. They will be very surprised at the blow back from the latest stunts from Ted Cruz and those who think we will vote for him when he is forced upon us.
CNN’s ‘fake news’ has 17M fake Twitter followers - One News Now
https://onenewsnow.com/media/2017/.../cnns-fake-news-has-17m-fake-twitter-followers.
Jul 1, 2017 - CNN’s ‘fake news’ has 17M fake Twitter followers ... sorting out how many phony Twitter followers companies and personalitieshave, ... The number of one’s Twitter followers can vary and be manipulated in a number of ways.
Twitter Is ‘Toast’ and the Stock Is Not Even Worth $10, Says Analyst!
Twitter is “toast” as a company and the stock is not even worth $10, according to a research note published Tuesday, following the departure of another top executive at the social media service. From a report on CNBC:The microblogging platform’s chief technology officer, Adam Messinger, tweeted that he would leave the company and “take some time off”, while Josh McFarland, vice president of product at Twitter, also said he was exiting the company. Both executives announced their departure on Tuesday. Meanwhile, last month, Adam Bain stepped down as chief operating officer last month to be replaced by chief financial officer Anthony Noto, who has yet to be replaced. Twitter has also lost leaders from business development, media and commerce, media partnerships, human resources, and engineering this year.
The departures prompted Trip Chowdhry, the managing director of equity research at Global Equities Research, and a noted “uber-bear” on tech stocks, to issue a note on Tuesday claiming Twitter is “toast” and “not even a $10 stock.” “Many investors were foolishly building (an) investment thesis based on complete stupidity,” Chowdhry wrote. The analyst said that Twitter’s data quality is “horrible”. Chowdhry said that many pollsters used Twitter data to predict a Hillary Clinton win in the U.S. election but the fact that Donald Trump won shows that data quality is poor. One reason for this is too many fake users on the platform, Chowdhry claims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.